298
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Improved pain acceptance and interference following outpatient interdisciplinary pediatric chronic pain treatment

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1482-1493 | Received 25 Nov 2020, Accepted 20 Dec 2021, Published online: 20 Jan 2022
 

Abstract

Objectives

Intensive interdisciplinary chronic pain treatment programs have demonstrated that pain acceptance predicts positive treatment outcomes, but limited research has focused on less-intensive programs. This study aimed to examine associations between changes in pain acceptance and pain interference among youth participating in an outpatient interdisciplinary chronic pain treatment program.

Design

Youth presenting to an evaluation within an interdisciplinary outpatient pediatric chronic pain program completed questionnaires at initial program evaluation (T1) and three months later (T2).

Main Outcome Measures

Youth (N = 94, Mage = 14.59 years, 74% female) completed the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, Adolescent Version (CPAQ-A) and PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference scale.

Results

Pain acceptance increased significantly from T1 to T2 (p=.001), driven primarily by activity engagement (p=.001). Pain interference decreased from T1 to T2 (p<.001). Improvements in acceptance were strongly associated with reductions in interference (p<.001). An exploratory cross-lagged structural equation model revealed a number of direct and indirect effects between pain acceptance and pain interference at T1 and T2.

Conclusion

Pain acceptance and interference improved after three months in an outpatient chronic pain treatment program. Improvements in acceptance were strongly related to reductions in interference. Future research should examine these relationships over longer periods, in larger samples.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [KS], upon reasonable request.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 458.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.