Experience with generic pegylated L-asparaginase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and monitoring of serum asparaginase activity

Abstract

Background: Pegylated asparaginase (P-Asp) though integral to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy is often not accessible to patients in developing countries. We share our clinical experience with generic P-Asp along with monitoring of asparaginase activity. Methods: In this prospective observational study, patients ≤18 years of age with ALL were assigned to receive either generic P-Asp or native asparaginase (N-Asp) in a non-randomized manner. Treatment protocol was based on ALL BFM-95 backbone. The dose of P-Asp was 1500 IU/m² by intravenous route during induction (Ia) and re-induction (IIa) phase of therapy. Results: N-Asp or P-Asp was administered to 52 and 54 of the 106 eligible patients respectively. Demographic and disease characteristics were comparable in both arms. The mean trough levels for N-Asp and P-Asp were 156.87 ± 22.35 IU/L and 216.03 ± 73.40 IU/L, respectively (p value <0.001) and all patients achieved therapeutic levels during Ia. Incidence of asparaginase-attributable toxicity was similar in the two arms in both phases of treatment, although hospitalization due to noninfectious causes was more common in P-Asp arm during Ia (13% versus 0%, p value, 0.01). Clinical hypersensitivity and silent inactivation were not observed during Ia while these occurred in 13% and 5% of patients in the N-Asp arm and P-Asp arms of IIa, respectively. The 2-year event free survival for P-Asp and N-Asp groups was 84% and 80.7%, respectively (p value 0.85). Conclusion: Generic P-Asp was observed to be efficacious and well tolerated in our patients and adequate therapeutic levels were sustained for 2 weeks.

Keywords:

• Asparaginase
• acute lymphoblastic leukemia
• hypersensitivity
• pegylated
• children

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Ms Meenu from department of laboratory services for her help in processing the samples. We acknowledge Ms Dhara Bhatt for technical inputs for the paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.