Utilization of supportive care medications and opportunities for pre-emptive pharmacogenomic testing in pediatric and young adults with leukemia

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the utilization of drugs with pharmacogenomic guidelines (PGx-drugs) for personalized dosing in pediatric leukemia. A retrospective observational study of pediatric leukemia patients admitted between 2009–2019 at a single-center academic children’s hospital was conducted to determine PGx-drug exposure within 3 years of diagnosis. Along with baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients, data regarding dates of diagnosis, relapse, death were collected. During the study period, inclusion criteria were met by 714 patients. The most frequently given medications were ondansetron (96.1%), morphine (92.2%), and allopurinol (85.3%) during the study period. In this cohort, 82% of patients received five or more PGx-drugs. Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia and leukemia unspecified were prescribed more PGx-drugs than other types of leukemia. There was a significant relationship between age at diagnosis and the number of PGx-drugs prescribed. Adolescents and adults both received a median of 10 PGx-drugs, children received a median of 6 PGx-drugs, and infants received a median of 7 PGx-drugs (p < 0.001). Patients with recurrent leukemia had significantly more PGx-drugs prescribed compared to those without recurrent disease, 10 drugs and 6 drugs, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients diagnosed with childhood leukemia are high utilizers of PGx-drugs. There is a vital need to understand how PGx testing may be utilized to optimize treatment and enhance quality of life. Preemptive PGx testing is a tool that aids in optimization of drug therapy and decreases the need for later treatment modifications. This can result in financial savings from decreased health-care encounters.

Keywords:

• Genomics
• leukemia
• pediatric
• pharmacogenetic
• precision medicine

Disclosure statement

All authors can attest that they have no potential conflict of interest, real or perceived; this includes a description of the role of the study sponsor(s), if any, in: (1) study design; (2) the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; (3) the writing of the report; and (4) the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by NIH: 5P30CA082709-23; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center Support Grant.