Publication Cover
Rethinking Marxism
A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society
Volume 25, 2013 - Issue 3
635
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium: Revisiting Resnick and Wolff's Reading of Overdetermination

On Overdetermination and Althusser: Our Response to Silverman and Park

Pages 341-349 | Published online: 25 Jun 2013
 

Abstract

We respond to critical comment directed at our understanding of overdetermination and our argument that Althusser fell into economic determinism despite also offering a way out of it. Our first response reviews what the concept of overdetermination is and what it implies. On that basis, we argue that the first critic's claim of “prediction” is logically impossible. Our second response explains why we still think that a tension arises in Althusser's work between formulating a notion of overdetermination that in effect rules out any form of causal determination in the last instance and yet affirming economic determination in the last instance. On that basis, we criticize and reject the second critic's claim that Althusser escaped this tension between offered nondeterminist and determinist positions.

Notes

1We agree with Silverman that reference to and use of Nietzsche is useful in arguing for overdetermination. That we did not do so in Knowledge and Class had more to do with our central purpose there: namely, to argue against determinisms and for overdetermination within the Marxian tradition. We were more concerned with analyzing the writings of Lenin, Lukács, Gramsci, Althusser, and so forth than non-Marxian writers. Richard Rorty did receive prominence because we read his Citation1979 book Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature after writing our first article, in 1982, rejecting economic determinism (see Resnick and Wolff Citation2006). We then were struck and encouraged by the parallel search for antiessentialism both within and without the Marxian tradition. While Rorty focused only on the latter, we saw a similar struggle within Marxism, and that was what we tried to argue later in our 1987 book. David Ruccio and Jack Amariglio (Citation2003) do give the writings of Nietzsche a prominent place in their brilliantly insightful analysis of modern economic reasoning.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 247.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.