Abstract
Social constructionism is an influential current of thought that has a strong impact on several fields of social sciences. However, some versions of social constructionism suggest implications that are questionable to many researchers: for instance, there is no reference to an objective reality; there are no criteria to discover the truth or to distinguish the true from the false; and science is merely a tradition among other traditions, such as religion. This essay argues that Marxist psychology and especially Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky’s cultural-historical school can contribute to a dialectical overcoming of this dipole between relativism and positivism, thereby constituting a theoretical framework for critical discourse analysis in psychology.
Notes
1 See Brown, Pujol, and Curt (Citation1998), Cromby and Nightingale (Citation1999), Flaskas (Citation2002), Frosh (Citation1995, Citation1997), Held (Citation1995), Lannamann (Citation1998a, Citation1998b), Larner (Citation1994), Parker (Citation1998), Pilgrim (Citation2000), Pocock (Citation1995), and Ratner (Citation2006).
2 For a better understanding of what critical psychology is, see Fox and Prilleltensky (Citation1997) and Hepburn (Citation2003).
4 See Bertrando (Citation2000), Brown, Pujol, and Curt (Citation1998), Collier (Citation1998), Cromby and Nightingale (Citation1999), Dickerson (Citation2010), Donovan (Citation2003), Frosh (Citation1995, Citation1997), Lannamann (Citation1998a, Citation1998b), Larner (Citation1994, Citation1995, Citation2011), Parker (Citation1998), Pilgrim (Citation2000), Pocock (Citation1995, Citation2015), Speed (Citation1991), and Willig (Citation1999).
Frosh, S. 1995. “Postmodernism vs. Psychotherapy.” Journal of Family Therapy 17, no. 2 (May): 175–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00012.x Frosh, S. 1997. “Postmodern Narratives: Or Muddles in the Mind.” In Multiple Voices: Narrative in Systemic Family Psychotherapy, ed. J. Byng-Hall and R. K. Papadopoulo, 86–99. London: Duckworth. Held, Β. 1995. Back to Reality: A Critique of Postmodern Theory in Psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton. Lannamann, J. W. 1998a. “The Place of the Constructed in a Materially Responsive World.” Family Process 37 (4): 421–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00421.x. Lannamann, J. W. 1998b. “Social Constructionism and Materiality: The Limits of Interdeterminacy in Therapeutic Settings.” Family Process 37 (4): 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00393.x. Larner, G. 1994. “Para-Modern Family Therapy: Deconstructing Post-Modernism.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 15 (March): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.1467-8438.1994.TB00977.X. Parker, I. 1998. “Against Postmodernism: Psychology in Cultural Context.” Theory and Psychology 8 (5): 621–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354398085002. Pilgrim, D. 2000. “The Real Problem for Postmodernism.” Journal of Family Therapy 22 (1): 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00135. Pocock, D. 1995. “Searching for a Better Story: Harnessing Modern and Postmodern Positions in Family Therapy.” Journal of Family Therapy 17 (2): 149–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00011.x. Ratner, C. 2006. Cultural Psychology. A Perspective on Psychological Functioning and Social Reform. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Fox, D., and I. Prilleltensky, eds. 1997. Critical Psychology: An Introduction. London: Sage. Hepburn, A. 2003. An introduction to Critical Social Psychology. London: Sage. Lenin, V. (1929) 1961. Collected Works. Vol. 38. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Lenin, V. (1929) 1961. Collected Works. Vol. 38. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Bertrando, P. 2000. “Text and Context: Narrative, Postmodernism and Cybernetics.” Journal of Family Therapy 22 (1): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00139. Brown, S. D., J. Pujol, and B. C. Curt. 1998. “As One in a Web? Discourse, Materiality and the Place of Ethics.” In Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism, ed. I. Parker, 75–90. London: Sage. Collier, A. 1998. “Language, Practice and Realism.” In Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism, ed. I. Parker, 47–58. London: Sage. Cromby, J., and D. J. Nightingale. 1999. “What’s Wrong with Social Constructionism?” In Social Constructionist Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice, ed. D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby, 1–21. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Dickerson, V. C. 2010. “Positioning Oneself within an Epistemology: Refining Our Thinking about Integrative Approaches.” Family Process 49 (3): 349–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01327.x. Donovan, M. 2003. “Family Therapy beyond Postmodernism: Some Considerations on the Ethical Orientation of Contemporary Practice.” Journal of Family Therapy 25 (3): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00249. Frosh, S. 1995. “Postmodernism vs. Psychotherapy.” Journal of Family Therapy 17, no. 2 (May): 175–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00012.x Frosh, S. 1997. “Postmodern Narratives: Or Muddles in the Mind.” In Multiple Voices: Narrative in Systemic Family Psychotherapy, ed. J. Byng-Hall and R. K. Papadopoulo, 86–99. London: Duckworth. Lannamann, J. W. 1998a. “The Place of the Constructed in a Materially Responsive World.” Family Process 37 (4): 421–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00421.x. Lannamann, J. W. 1998b. “Social Constructionism and Materiality: The Limits of Interdeterminacy in Therapeutic Settings.” Family Process 37 (4): 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00393.x. Larner, G. 1994. “Para-Modern Family Therapy: Deconstructing Post-Modernism.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 15 (March): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.1467-8438.1994.TB00977.X. Larner, G. 1995. “The Real as Illusion: Deconstructing Power in Family Therapy.” Journal of Family Therapy 17 (2): 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00013.x. Larner, G. 2011. “Deconstructing Theory: Towards an Ethical Therapy.” Theory & Psychology 21 (6): 821–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310395061. Parker, I. 1998. “Against Postmodernism: Psychology in Cultural Context.” Theory and Psychology 8 (5): 621–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354398085002. Pilgrim, D. 2000. “The Real Problem for Postmodernism.” Journal of Family Therapy 22 (1): 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00135. Pocock, D. 1995. “Searching for a Better Story: Harnessing Modern and Postmodern Positions in Family Therapy.” Journal of Family Therapy 17 (2): 149–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00011.x. Pocock, D. 2015. “The Case for Critical Realism.” Journal of Family Therapy 37 (2): 167–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12027. Speed, Β. 1991. “Reality Exists O.K.? An Argument against Constructivism and Social Constructionism.” Journal of Family Therapy 13 (4): 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1991.00436.X. Willig, C. 1999. “Beyond Appearances: A Critical Realist Approach to Social Constructionist Work.” In Social Constructionist Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice, ed. D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby, 37–52. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})