25
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sex differences in unmet needs between male and female older veterans

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Received 21 Dec 2023, Accepted 27 Jun 2024, Published online: 08 Jul 2024
 

Abstract

Aging Veterans face complex needs across multiple domains. However, the needs of older female Veterans and the degree to which unmet needs differ by sex are unknown. We analyzed responses to the HERO CARE survey from 7,955 Veterans aged 55 years and older (weighted N = 490,148), 93.9% males and 6.1% females. We evaluated needs and unmet needs across the following domains: activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs (IADLs), health management, and social. We calculated weighted estimates and compared sex differences using age-adjusted prevalence ratios. On average, female Veterans were younger, more were Non-Hispanic Black and unmarried. Females and males reported a similar prevalence of problems across all domains. However, compared to males, female Veterans had a lesser prevalence of missed appointments due to transportation (aPR 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26–0.92), housework unmet needs (aPR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.20–0.97), and medication management unmet needs (aPR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.11–0.95) but a higher prevalence of healthcare communication unmet needs (aPR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.13–5.05) and monitoring health conditions unmet needs (aPR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.08–4.20). Female Veterans’ common experience of unmet needs in communicating with their healthcare teams could result in care that is less aligned with their preferences or needs. As the number of older female Veterans grows, these data and additional work to understand sex-specific unmet needs and ways to address them are essential to providing high-quality care for female Veterans.

Ethical approval

This project was classified as a non-research project by the Miami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Human Studies Subcommittee because the findings were intended to inform VA operations and were therefore exempt from IRB review in compliance with VA Handbook 1058.05i.

No compensation was provided to Veterans for participation. To ensure privacy, efforts were taken to protect the identity of participants and ensure that data were kept confidential. Identifiable information will only be maintained on a VA server; documentation of the procedure used to code the data will remain within the VA. All identifiers collected as part of this research project will be destroyed as per the records control schedule (RCS 10-1) of the Veterans Health Administration. Electronic files will be stored in folders with restricted access on a protected computer shared drive behind the VA firewall in a secure server. Data will not be transmitted as an attachment to unprotected email messages. The data will be accessible only to personnel involved in the study. All staff was trained to avoid breach of confidentiality issues.

Author contributions

Sandra Garcia-Davis wrote the manuscript and performed the data analysis All authors contributed to the concept, preparation, and revision of the manuscript and approved its final version. Jared Hansen and Benjamin Brintz derived the weights used in this study. The investigators retained full independence in the conduct of this research. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government. The authors assume full responsibility for the ideas presented.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data sets generated and analyzed during this study are not publicly available owing to Department of Veterans Affairs and ethical redactions as well as redaction of ethically sensitive information; however, instructions on obtaining the data are available upon request.

Additional information

Funding

This work is supported by the Health Services Research & Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA SDR 18-313), the VA Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care, and by the VA Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers (GRECCs). This work was also supported in part by the VA HSR&D Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation (CIN 13-414) and Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i). Dr. Pugh was supported by Health Services Research and Development Service Research Career Scientist Award (1 IK6 HX002608). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government. The sponsors had no role in the study design, data analysis, data interpretation, or preparation of the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 330.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.