Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 13, 2006 - Issue 4
154
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Disclosure in NIH K-Award Funded Diabetes and Obesity Clinical TrialsFootnote

, , , , &
Pages 311-324 | Published online: 21 Dec 2006
 

Abstract

In 1993, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) passed The Revitalization Act (Subtitle B) which mandated that all NIH funded clinical trials have “appropriate representation” of minority and women subjects. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of the mandate by examining the reporting and inclusion of minority and female subjects into NIH K-Award funded clinical trials, addressing the minority predominant diagnoses of diabetes and clinical obesity. Using the CRISP search engine and PUBMED, we selected publications published by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) K-grant recipients during 1989–2004, associated with all the diabetes and obesity clinical trials. Studies were stratified into three timeline categories (1989–1993, pre-mandate; 1993–1996, post-mandate, and 1997–present, well past mandate) to evaluate trends in the recruiting of minorities and women before, during, and after the passing of the Revitalization Act. Of the 165 papers, only 37% disclosed race, a number that did not improve over time (p = .15), whereas 92% disclosed gender. Clinical trials that focused on females increased across the 3 timeframes (p < .001) for diabetes studies but not obesity studies. Overall, disclosure of race declined over the 3 timeframes whereas individually, the disclosure of African Americans improved.

Mr. Guevara, Dr. Cook, and Dr. Pietrobon were responsible for the study idea. Mr. Guevara, Dr. Cook, Ms. Herback, and Dr. Jacobs were responsible for writing the manuscript. Dr. Cook, Dr. Vail, and Dr. Pietrobon were responsible for the statistical analysis. Dr. Cook and Dr. Vail were responsible for the final editing of the article.

Notes

∗This study was approved by the Duke University IRB and Ethics Committee.

∗Median values instead of Std. Dev. Because these variables have non-normal distribution.

∗∗ Value for only one observation.

S.1 – National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993. Subtitle B—Clinical Research Equity Regarding Women and Minorities.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 461.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.