32
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Seeking help as a strategy for ethical and professional decision-making in research: Perspectives of researchers from East Asia and the United States

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Received 02 Nov 2023, Accepted 23 May 2024, Published online: 03 Jun 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Background: A person’s cultural background shapes how they interpret and navigate problems. Given that large numbers of international researchers work and train in the U.S. we sought to better understand how researchers use the decision-making strategy of seeking help to navigate ethical and professional challenges.Methods: Participants (N = 300) were researchers working or training in the U.S. who were born in East Asia (EA) or born in the U.S. They completed a screening survey; then a subset completed think-aloud interviews (n = 66) focused on how they would respond to three hypothetical research scenarios.Results: Thematic analysis of the transcripts showed that seeking help was a commonly endorsed strategy, with some nuances between groups. Themes included seeking help in the form of getting advice, seeking someone to help solve the problem, and gathering information. Endorsement of the seeking help strategy frequently depended on participants’ relationships; desiring to seek help from people they trusted. Notably, EA participants tended to prefer seeking help in ways that avoided reputational harm to others.Conclusion: A better understanding of how researchers from different cultural backgrounds use decision-making strategies can inform how to make educational programs more inclusive and comprehensive to more effectively develop researchers’ ethical and professional decision-making skills.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sophia Pan, Emma Zijlstra, and Mihi Dormeville for their assistance with this research.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Declaration

This research was approved by the Washington University School of Medicine IRB (#202007083).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [NSF 2024345] and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [NCATS UL1TR002345]. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 461.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.