501
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Textbook and popular science text reading: boys’ and girls’ comprehension and assimilation of academic language

Pages 1792-1815 | Received 21 Oct 2021, Accepted 26 Jun 2022, Published online: 05 Jul 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Reading can be considered constitutive epistemology for science and a fundamental aspect of scientific literacy. This study attempted to give further insights into the comprehension of different genres of science texts (textbook and popular science) and the assimilation of the academic language by adolescent age students. The writings 14- and 15-year-old students produced after reading one of these two genres were analysed while controlling for their reading skills and gender. The results indicated that popular science text readers achieved better comprehension scores for some of the ideas provided by the texts and that the performance of boys and girls reading the popular science materials tended to converge for most of the text ideas. Furthermore, analysis of some attributes of scientific writing revealed significant linguistic differences in the writings produced by the readers of different text genres. Data interpretation implies that (a) the influence of text genre on reading comprehension can be restrained only to some of the text imparted propositions; (b) certain school science text genres were prone to reverse the well-known girls’ reading superiority over boys; and (c) students can reproduce text characteristics in their writing that is more consistent with academic language. Overall, the findings presented favour a view that science reading is a complex phenomenon that merits more in-depth research.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements are due to the teachers and school coordinators who have agreed on our presence in the school to make this work. Also to Prof. Matthew Kloser for his feedback on an earlier version of this paper, to Prof. Larry Yore for his careful suggested revisions, and to Shari Yore for the technical revision of this work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

This research was approved by the FEUSP. Participants of the study gave consent prior to their participation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 388.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.