103
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Cognitive learning about forests: the key role of environmental attitude

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 18 Dec 2022, Accepted 23 Feb 2024, Published online: 20 Mar 2024
 

ABSTRACT

For young people, schools are platforms for learning and strengthening competencies about nature preservation; despite being faced with the same learning opportunities, learning outcomes are very heterogeneous. We were interested in environmental knowledge gains and retention after participation in a student-centred learning programme, and in environmental attitudes’ role in knowledge acquisition. 261 students participated in a 90-minute programme about the forest ecosystem and related sustainability topics. Our 8-station in-classroom module relied on a collaborative, hands-on, and autonomy-supportive learning approach. We measured knowledge three times: before the programme (pre-test), right after programme completion (post-test), and six weeks after programme completion to test long-term performance (retention test), using the Rasch model. Knowledge scores increased in the post-test and decreased in the retention test but remained significantly above pre-test scores. Environmental attitude had a considerable effect on knowledge scores of each test time, though effects on pre- and retention scores were larger. This indicates that students with positive attitudes knew more before the programme and retained more knowledge over time. Interestingly, the retention scores of those with the most positive attitudes exceeded their post-programme scores, which suggests further immersion into the topic, rendering attitude a probable and promising lever for long-term knowledge acquisition.

View correction statement:
Correction

Acknowledgements

We thank all teachers and students who participated in our study, and all researchers and in particular Dr. Thorn who collected and provided the data. We also thank Stephen Tomkins for his final suggestions on the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Bavarian Ministry of Education (‘Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Bildung und Kultus, Wissenschaft und Kunst’ (II.7-5 O 5106/92/7, and III.9-5 O 5106/91/13). This approval involves the written consent of all principals of all participating schools, all participants and their legal guardians. It also involves data privacy laws that relies on pseudonymized data.

Correction Statement

This article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version. Please see Correction (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2341213)

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Bayreuth, the Elite study programme MINT Teacher Education PLUS (S-NW-2015-316), and the “Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung” (BMBF 01JA1901).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 388.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.