291
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

CLIL students’ production of cognitive discourse functions: Comparing Finnish and Spanish contexts

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 381-400 | Received 08 Sep 2022, Accepted 17 Apr 2023, Published online: 31 May 2023
 

Abstract

This article presents findings from an empirical study in which we investigated Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) students’ linguistic resources in the L2 (English) to convey different Cognitive Discourse Functions (Dalton-Puffer 2013; Citation2016)—Describe, Compare (Categorize), Report, Evaluate and Explore—in two different contexts. The participants were primary school students (grade 6) participating in CLIL programs in Finland and Spain. To allow comparison, two sets of data were obtained by asking the students to write in response to a similar prompt in the area of social science (History in the Spanish context and Geography in the Finnish context). We compared the frequency of the Cognitive Discourse Functions (CDFs) produced, and the fluency and complexity of students’ realizations of CDFs, using tools of Systemic Functional Linguistics. The results reveal similarities across contexts in the frequency and extension of some of the CDFs produced, and differences in terms of CDF complexity, measured in students’ use of clause complexes, Appraisal resources and complex nominal groups to express different CDFs.

Keywords:

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figure 1. Prompt for Spanish students.

Figure 1. Prompt for Spanish students.

Figure 2. Prompt for Finnish students.

Figure 2. Prompt for Finnish students.

Figure 3. Prompts for individual CDFs across contexts.

Figure 3. Prompts for individual CDFs across contexts.

Figure 4. Response to the CDF prompts across contexts.

Figure 4. Response to the CDF prompts across contexts.

Figure 5. Number of words per CDF across contexts (Fluency).

Figure 5. Number of words per CDF across contexts (Fluency).

Figure 6. Number of clauses per T-Unit across CDFs.

Figure 6. Number of clauses per T-Unit across CDFs.

Figure 7. Distribution of complex nominal groups (NGs) across CDFs.

Figure 7. Distribution of complex nominal groups (NGs) across CDFs.

Notes

1 Categorize was incorporated as a new category by Evnitskaya and Dalton-Puffer (Citation2023) in substitution of classify, which remained a subcategory of categorize.

2 The parts of the extracts in bold illustrate the use of subordinate clauses in each T-Unit

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain). Ref: FFI2014-55590-R.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 363.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.