Over the last decade, Australian researchers have published widely on various issues of quality management in the context of Australian businesses. Only a few recent studies have measured reliability and validity in the development of quality management constructs and scales through rigorous statistical techniques. In this paper, the quality management literature was surveyed for scale development efforts and four studies were identified. These studies were reviewed to identify the statistical techniques and methods being utilized to develop scales of measurement. Similarities and differences of techniques of scale development were pointed out and suggestions are made for those who conduct future research and who evaluate it for possible publication. Although the number of published studies is small, they provide a baseline to which scale development efforts are measured in the future.
A review of empirical research on Total Quality Management using scale developing methods: An Australian perspective
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.