1,602
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Work–life management tensions in multinational enterprises (MNEs)

Pages 1681-1709 | Published online: 19 Oct 2015
 

Abstract

Global work–life initiatives present unique challenges for HR departments in multinational enterprises (MNEs) because of the complexity of implementing policies that require sensitivity to local issues such as cultural traditions and legislation. A tension-centered approach to analyzing these complexities, not utilized in previous research on the topic, is applied here. Three generic sources of tensions are developed: strategic/policy versus operational considerations, centralization versus decentralization and contextual/institutional versus organizational demands. Earlier research yields four potential responses to tensions: opposition, spatial separation, temporal separation and synthesis, with a fifth option added for no recognition of tension. The framework is applied to global work–life initiatives using data from 27 qualitative interviews with regional and global HR managers employed by 13 MNEs. There is evidence supporting the prevalence of each of the three generic sources of and five responses to tension, and of overlap across categories and responses. For managers, the analysis provides useful insights for constructing global work–life initiatives that are effective and responsive to local conditions. For researchers, the tensions approach yields a relevant tool for analyzing global work–life initiatives. For both, the findings suggest it is important to guard against biases related to Western notions of progress.

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge funding provided by the Society of Human Resource Management Foundation and the Australian Centre for Research in Employment and Work. I thank Helen De Cieri for her contributions to an earlier stage of this project. I am grateful to the editor, anonymous reviewers and Robert Drago for their guidance and advice on this article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. The categories were informed by tensions’ theory, and a lengthier list (with six mainly but not entirely overlapping categories) was developed from prior research to generate the interview instrument.

2. This research is specifically related to IHRM. For simplicity, the term ‘global HR’ is used instead.

3. Note that the questions were written prior to the development of Figure ; fortunately, the fit is relatively clean.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 352.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.