220
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Treatment of acid rock drainage using a sulphate-reducing bioreactor with a limestone precolumn

, , &
Pages 185-196 | Received 17 Mar 2021, Accepted 29 Jul 2021, Published online: 20 Aug 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) offer promise for the treatment of mine waste due to their effectiveness removing toxic heavy metals as highly insoluble metal sulphides and their ability to generate alkalinity. The main objective of this study was to develop a treatment composed of a sulphate-reducing bioreactor with a limestone precolumn for the removal of Cu(II) from a synthetic ARD. The purpose of the limestone column was to increase the pH values and decrease the level of Cu in the effluent to prevent SRB inhibition. The system was fed with a pH-2.7 synthetic ARD containing Cu(II) (10–40 mg/L), sulphate (2000 mg/L) and acetate (2.5 g COD/L) for 150 days. Copper removal efficiencies in the two-stage system were very high (95–99%), with a final concentration of 0.53 mg/L Cu, and almost complete removal occurred in the limestone precolumn. In the same manner, the acidity of the synthetic ARD was effectively reduced in the limestone precolumn to 7.3 and the pH was raised in the bioreactor (7.3–8.0). COD consumption by methanogens was predominant from day 0–118, but SRB dominated at the end of the experiment (day 150) when the average COD removal and sulphide production were 74.8% and 61.7%, respectively. Study of the microbial taxonomic composition in the bioreactor revealed that Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta were the most prevalent methanogens while the genera Desulfotomaculum and Syntrophobacter were the dominant SRB. Among the SRB identified Desulfotomaculum intricatum (99% identity) and Desulfotomaculum acetoxidans (96%) were the most abundant sequences of bacteria capable of using acetate.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Data availability statement

Sequencing reads from this study have been deposited in GeneBank with accession numbers for 16S rRNA gene (KX929998-KX930012) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KX929998 to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KX930012) and for dsrB gene (KY569511­KY569520) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY569511.1 to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY569520.1)

Acknowledgements

We are very thankful to Maria Aracely Zambrano for her helpful comments. This research was funded by Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ (USFQ Grant #16914). This research was carried out with permit number 30-2011-IC-FLO-DPAP/MA of the Ecuadorian Ministry of the Environment.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Universidad San Francisco de Quito [grant number 16914].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 223.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.