Treatment of acid rock drainage using a sulphate-reducing bioreactor with a limestone precolumn

References

• Kefeni KK, Msagati TAM, Mamba BB. Acid mine drainage: prevention, treatment options, and resource recovery: a review. J Clean Prod. 2017;151:475–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park I, et al. A review of recent strategies for acid mine drainage prevention and mine tailings recycling. Chemosphere. 2019;219:588–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipper C, Skounsen J. In: JA Jacobs, JH Lehr, SM Testa, editors. Passive treatment of acid mine drainage, in acid mine drainage, rock drainage, and acid sulfate soils: causes, assessment, prediction, prevention, and remediation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran MG, Pakshirajan K, Das G. Heavy metal removal from multicomponent system by sulfate reducing bacteria: mechanism and cell surface characterization. J Hazard Mater. 2017;324(Part A):62–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe M, Kojima H, Fukui M. Review of Desulfotomaculum species and proposal of the genera Deslfallas gen. nov., Desulfofundulus gen. nov., Desulfofarcimen gen. nov. and Desulfohalotomaculum gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68(9):2891–2899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, et al. A gradual change between methanogenesis and sulfidogenesis during a long-temr UASB treatmen for sulfate-rich chemical wastewater. Sci Total Environ. 2018;636:168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyzer G, Stams AJM. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:441–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaksonen AH, Puhakka JA. Sulfate reduction based processes for the treatment of acid mine drainage and the recovery of metals. Eng Life Sci. 2007;7(6):541–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Andrea I, et al. Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage. J Hazard Mater. 2014;269:98–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukwevho MJ, Maharajh D, Chirwa EMN. Evaluating the effect of pH, temperature and hydraulic retention time on biological sulphate reduction using response surface methodoloy. Water (Basel). 2020;12(1662):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Paulo LM, Stams AJ, Sousa DZ. Methanogens, sulphate and heavy metals: a complex system. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2015;14:537–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera G, et al. Toxic effects of dissolved heavy metals on Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Desulfovibrio sp. strains. J Hazard Mater. 2006;135(1–3):40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azabou S, et al. Isolation and characterization of a mesophilic heavy-metals-tolerant sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfomicrobium sp. from an enrichment culture using phosphogypsum as a sulfate source. J Hazard Mater. 2007;140:264–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utgikar VP, et al. Acute toxicity of heavy metals to acetate-utilizing mixed cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria: EC100 and EC500. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001;20:2662–2669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karri S, Sierra-Alvarez R, Field JA. Toxicity of copper to acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic activities of methanogens and sulfate reducers in anaerobic sludge. Chemosphere. 2006;62:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sani RK, Peyton BM, Brown LT. Copper-induced inhibition of growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans G20: assesment of its toxicity and correlation with those of zinc and lead. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:4765–4772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins M, et al. Characterization and activity studies of highly heavy metal resistant sulphate-reducing bacteria to be used in acid mine drainage decontamination. J Hazard Mater. 2009;30(166):706–713.
   Google Scholar
• Iakovleva E, et al. Acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment: neutralization and toxic elements removal with unmodified and modified limestone. Ecol Eng. 2015;81:30–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin D, et al. A novel approach for treating acid mine drainage through forming shcwertmannite driven by a mixed culture of Acidiphilium multivorum and Acidithiobacillus ferroxidans priot to lime neutralization. J Hazard Mater. 2020;400: 123108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Silva BM, et al. Inhibition of sulfate reduction by iron, cadmium, and sulfide in granular sludge. J Hazard Mater. 2009;172:400–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres E, et al. Passive elimination of sulfate and metals from acid mine drainage using combined limestone and barium carbonate systems. J Clean Prod. 2018;182:114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado J, et al. Remediation experiment of Ecuadorian acid mine drainage: geochemical models of dissolved species and secondary minerals saturation. Environ Sci Pollution Res. 2019;26:34854–34872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa-Herrera V, et al. Toxicity of copper(II) ions to microorganisms in biological wastewater treatment systems. Sci Total Environ. 2011;412-413:380–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez G. Removal of copper in a sulfate reducing bioreactor with a limestone pre-column system, in Institute of microbiology. Quito: Universidad San Francisco de Quito; 2016. p. 75.
   Google Scholar
• APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra-Alvarez R, Hollingsworth J, Zhou MS. Removal of copper in an integrated sulfate reducing bioreactor-crystallization reactor system. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(4):1426–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capone KA, et al. Diversity of the human skin microbiome early in life. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(10):2026–2032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller AL, et al. Phylogenetic and environmental diversity of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductases. ISME J. 2015;9(5):1152–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omil F, et al. Long-term competition between sulfate reducing and methanogenic bacteria in UASB reactors treating volatile fatty acids. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998;57(6):676–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, et al. Competitive dynamics of anaerobes during long-term biological sulfate reduction process in a UASB reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2019;280:173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens PNL, et al. Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 1998;28(1):41–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X-J, et al. Enhanced elementary sulfur recovery in integrated sulfate-reducing, sulfur-producing reactor under micro-aerobic condition. Bioresour Technol. 2012;116:517–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, et al. Effect of influent COD/SO42- ratios on UASB treatment of a synthetic sulfate-containing wastewater. Chemosphere. 2015;130:24–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing Z, et al. UASB performance and electron competition between methane-producing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in treating sulfate-rich wastewater containing ethanol and acetate. Bioresour Technol. 2013;137:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sela-Adler M, et al. Co-existance of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction with common substrates in sulfare-rich estuarine sediments. Front Microbiol. 2017;8(766):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ňancucheo I, Johnson DB. Selective removal of transition metals from acidic mine waters by novel consortia of acidophilic sulfidogenic bacteria. Microb Biotechnol. 2012;5(1):34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stams AJ, et al. Metabolic interactions in methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bioreactors. Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(1–2):13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe M, Kojima H, Fukui M. Desulfotomaculum intricatum sp. nov., a sulfate reducer isolated from freshwater lake sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:3574–3578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro HF, Williams NH, Ogram A. Phylogeny of sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000;31(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colleran E, Finnegan S, Lens P. Anaerobic treatment of sulphate-containing waste streams. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1995;67(1):29–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oude Elferink SJWH, Boschker HTS, Stams AJM. Identification of sulfate reducers and syntrophobacter sp. in anaerobic granular sludge by fatty-acid biomarkers and 16S rRNA probing. Geomicrobiol J. 1998;15(1):3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki D, et al. Desulfobulbus japonicus sp. nov., a novel gram-negative propionate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from an estuarine sediment in Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:849–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikuta E, et al. Desulfotomaculum alkaliphilum sp. nov., a new alkaliphilic, moderately thermophilic, sulfate-reducing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Palacios E, et al. Microbial diversity dynamics in a methanogenic-sulfidogenic UASB reactor. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin L, Rittmann B, Stahl DA. Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic populations in anaerobic biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(10):3847–3857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santegoeds CM, et al. Distribution of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic aggregates determined by microsensor and molecular analyses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(10):4618–4629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin SA, et al. The microbial community of a passive biochemical reactor treating arsenic, zinc, and sulfate-rich seepage. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3(27):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baskaran VK. Kinetics of anaerobic sulphate reduction in immobilised cell bioreactors, in Chemical Engineering. Saskatoon (SK): University of Saskatchewan; 2005. p. 1–166.
   Google Scholar