1,385
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Salience, transparency, and self-nudging: a digital nudge to promote healthier food product choices

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 12 Aug 2021, Accepted 20 Jun 2023, Published online: 29 Aug 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Information Systems (IS) research has proposed digital nudges as a promising toolset for supporting consumers in making better decisions. However, there is a vivid academic debate regarding the ethical underpinnings of nudging and potential measures to alleviate ethical concerns. One particularly promising approach to digital nudging is leveraging salience effects. Yet, the potential of digital salience nudges remains underexplored in IS literature, and little is known about how measures proposed to alleviate ethical concerns affect their behavioural impact. In a preregistered online experiment (N = 600), we assess the effects of a digital salience nudge on the healthiness of food product choices. Additionally, we examine how two proposed ethical measures, namely transparency and self-nudging, influence the nudge’s effects. We find that implementing the digital salience nudge in an online supermarket decreased the proportion of unhealthy food products chosen by 63% and increased the proportion of healthy alternatives by 30%. Notably, disclosing transparent information about the nudge did not impact its effectiveness. Offering the nudge as a self-nudge led to comparable effects to a preset nudge when combined with transparent information. We conclude that digital salience nudging is effective and that nudges can be ethically designed without compromising their behavioural impact.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank senior editor Sabine Matook, the anonymous associate editor, and the reviewers for their valuable feedback during the review process. Special thanks go to Alexander Glas, Lena Sophia Müller, and Daniel Perico Ortiz for their support with the statistical analyses.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. We initially hypothesised that the effects of our digital salience nudge on the proportion of (un-)healthy food products would be greater for individuals who implemented it as a self-nudge. We changed this hypothesis for a more holistic view, but still report the results of the instrumental variable regressions testing these hypotheses in Appendix D. We do not report our results on the effects of our interventions on the participants' acceptance of the nudge in this paper.

2. The implementation of the nudge in the self-nudging groups was endogenous. To account for self-selection effects, we additionally calculated instrumental variable regressions that fully supported our main findings and are reported in Appendix D.

3. We did not include the prices of the individual products in our model because the food products in all categories were balanced across three price and healthiness levels and we only analysed the food product choices on an aggregated level.

Additional information

Funding

Parts of this research was funded by the Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts, in a program coordinated by the Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation (bidt).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 337.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.