477
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Evaluated interventions addressing developmental transitions for youth with mental health disorders: a meta-analysis

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 6155-6165 | Received 05 Oct 2020, Accepted 20 Jul 2021, Published online: 29 Aug 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this meta-analysis was to provide a quantitative synthesis of the effects of studies evaluating developmentally appropriate programs or interventions for transition-age youth with mental health disorders.

Methods

Studies, between January 1992 and March 2021, were included if they contained a sample population with a median age between 12 and 25 years and with a mental health disorder and described the results of health interventions addressing aspects of developmental transitions. Independent reviewers screened study texts and assessed the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool data on standardized mean differences.

Results

Under neurodevelopmental studies (6), the effect size of interventions measuring social outcomes was 1.00 (95% CI: −0.01 to 2.00), parental stress levels was −0.10 (95% CI:−0.74 to 0.55), autism symptoms was −0.40 (95% CI: −1.58 to 0.78), and self-determination was 0.16 (95% CI:−0.38 to 0.70). Under mental illness studies (3), the effect size of interventions measuring adolescent depressive symptoms was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.96) and parental depressive symptoms was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.20 to 1.97).

Conclusions

There is no effect of interventions except on parental depressive symptoms under mental illness studies. Further research with comparable outcomes and assessments is needed.

    Implications for rehabilitation:

  • Interventions for youth with mental health disorders should be developmentally appropriate and incorporate elements to assist youth in multiple aspects of their lives.

  • The following approaches should be considered in interventions: skills training, prevocational/vocational guidance, a client-centered approach, and/or an ecological/experiential approach.

  • Intervention researchers and practitioners should incorporate similar outcome assessment tools and measures in order to allow for valid comparisons between intervention effectiveness.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Pallavi Dutta, Andrew Canete, and members of the INCH lab for help with assistance in the screening process.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

MYK is supported by an Early Researchers Award by the Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.