http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6640-337X
![Sample our Law journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5942/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Law.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
For decades the mental health system has been ‘in crisis,’ with too little funding, too much demand and fragmented services. In England and Wales, decisions made concerning the care and treatment of those suffering from a mental disorder is governed by the Mental Health Act 1983 (as amended) (MHA 1983). Detention under the legislation is fraught with conflict; patient and clinical views are often at odds. Mental health tribunals enable patients to seek a review of their case and the legality of their detention. This paper argues that with the increased use of formal detention under the MHA 1983, the caseloads of mental health tribunals have similarly risen. Whether it is possible to advance therapeutic benefit to psychiatric patients attending tribunals is open to question. While mental health tribunals have a role to play in generating a positive psychological impact on an applicant, there is a risk that time and resource pressures may inhibit the adoption of a therapeutic approach. This paper considers the key drivers that are currently pushing detention rates up, the impact this is having on mental health tribunal caseloads and whether it is possible to bring therapeutic jurisprudence to the patient.
Acknowledgments
This paper results from a small follow-on study funded by the Humanities Strategic Investment Fund, University of Manchester. It follows an initial public policy seminar held in December 2017, which examined current mental health tribunal practice and was funded by the University of Manchester and the UK Administrative Justice Institute (UKAJI). Thanks to the Ministry of Justice, the Department of Health and Social Care and HM Courts and Tribunals Service for invaluable support during this research.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.