Therapeutic jurisprudence and mental health tribunals: changing patterns of demand and its impact

References

• Allmark, P., et al., 2013. Assessing the health benefits of advice services: using research evidence and logic model methods to explore complex pathways. Health & social care in the community, 21 (1), 59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., 2005. Social work and a social model of madness and distress: developing a viable role for the future. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 12 (2), 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, S. and Wessely, S., 1994. The pattern of delays in mental health review tribunals. Psychiatric Bulletin, 18, 98–400.
   Google Scholar
• Borschmann, R.D., et al., 2010. Section 136 of the Mental Health Act: a new literature review. Medicine, science, and the law, 50, 34–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha, U.A., et al., 2010. The revolving door phenomenon in psychiatry: comparing low-frequency and high-frequency users of psychiatric inpatient services in a developing country. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 45 (4), 461–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, T., et al., 2013. Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial. The lancet, 381 (9878), 1627–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Care Quality Commission, 2015. Right here right now: people’s experiences of help, care and support during a mental health crisis. London: CQC.
   Google Scholar
• Care Quality Commission, 2016. Monitoring the Mental Health Act in 2015/16. London: CQC.
   Google Scholar
• Care Quality Commission/AJTC, 2011. Patients’ experiences of the first-tier tribunal (Mental health) report of a joint pilot project of the administrative justice and tribunals council and the care quality commission. London: CQC.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T., et al., 2007. Mental health tribunals: ‘TJ’ implications of weighing fairness, freedom, protection and treatment. Journal of Judicial Administration, 17 (1), 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, R., 1991. From dangerousness to risk. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, eds. The foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 281–299.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, A. and Ellins, J., 2007. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. British medical journal, 335 (7609), 24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J., 2010. Supervised community treatment orders. In: J. McHale and J. Laing, eds. Principles of mental health law and policy. Oxford: OUP, 513–555.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, 2011. No health without mental health: a cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all age. London: HM Government/Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, 2012. Post-legislative assessment of the Mental Health Act 2007: memorandum to the health committee of the house of commons cmnd 8408. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, 2015. Mental Health Act code of practice. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Eades, S., 2018. Impact evaluation of an Independent Mental Health Advocacy (IMHA) service in a high secure hospital: a co-produced survey measuring self-reported changes to patient self-determination. Mental health and social inclusion, 22 (1), 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firn, M., et al., 2013. A dismantling study of assertive outreach services: comparing activity and outcomes following replacement with the FACT model. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 48, 997–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freckleton, I., 2003. Mental health review tribunal decision-making: a therapeutic jurisprudence lens. Psychiatry, psychology and law, 10 (1), 44–62.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, N., 1999. Mental health and housing: A crisis on the streets? Journal of social welfare and family law, 21 (4), 327–337.
   Google Scholar
• Glover-Thomas, N., 2011. The age of risk: risk perception and determination following the Mental Health Act 2007. Medical law review, 19 (4), 581–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover-Thomas, N., 2013. The Health and Social Care Act 2012: the emergence of equal treatment for mental health care or another false dawn? Medical law international, 13 (4), 279–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glover-Thomas, N. and Barr, W., 2008. Re-examining the benefits of charitable involvement in housing the mentally vulnerable. Northern Ireland legal quarterly, 59 (2), 177–200.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, A., O'Regan, M., and Traverso, A., 1996. Therapeutic jurisprudence and patients' perceptions of procedural due process of civil commitment hearings. In: D. Wexler, B. Winnick, eds. Law in a therapeutic key: developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 923-934
   Google Scholar
• Hale, B., et al., 2017. Mental health law. 6th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. and Pochin, M., 2001. A right result? Advocacy, justice and empowerment. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, M., 2017. Compulsory mental health treatment: when should judges get involved? Speech by judge Mark Hinchliffe, deputy chamber president first-tier tribunal (Health education and social care chamber). Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/judge-mark-hinchliffe-compulsory-mental-health-treatment-hong-kong-20170829.pdf [Accessed 9 Sep 2018].
   Google Scholar
• HM Courts and Tribunals Service, 2012. First-tier tribunal health, education and social care chamber mental health jurisdiction: room specification recommendations for tribunal hearings. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Courts and Tribunals Service, 2013. Practice direction first-tier tribunal health education and social care chamber statements and reports in HMCTS. Mental health cases. London: HMCTS.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury, 2017. Autumn budget - 2017 NHS spending. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Rothstein, H., and Baldwin, R., 2001. The government of risk understanding risk regulation regimes. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., 2016. The cost of mental illness. The Guardian, 17 May.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, J., 2000. Rights versus risk? Reform of the Mental Health Act 1983. Medical law review, 8 (2), 210–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lintern, S., 2014. Analysis reveals mental health trust funding cuts. Health Service Journal, 14 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, S., et al., 2016. Mental health and wellbeing in England: adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2014. Leeds: NHS Digital.
   Google Scholar
• McNicoll, A., 2015. Mental health trust funding down 8per cent from 2010 despite coalition’s drive for parity of esteem. Community Care, 20 Mar.
   Google Scholar
• Mental Health Taskforce, 2016. The five year forward view for mental health a report from the independent Mental Health Taskforce to the NHS in England. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2016. Transforming our justice system by the lord chancellor, the lord chief justice and the senior president of tribunals. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, L., 2011. Legal architecture. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, F. A., 2014. The octet trial, community treatment orders and evidence-based practice. The psychiatric bulletin, 38(4), 197 doi:10.1192/pb.38.4.197
   Google Scholar
• Newbigging, K., et al., 2015. When you haven’t got much of a voice: an evaluation of the quality of Independent Mental Health Advocate (IMHA) services in England. Health and social care in the community, 23 (3), 313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS Digital, 2015. Deprivation of liberty safeguards (DoLS) - monthly summary statistics - quarter 4 2014/15 (January to March). London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Digital; Office for National Statistics, Mental Health Minimum Data Set / Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Dataset and Hospital Episode Statistics, NHS Digital; Office for National Statistics, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Digital, 2017. Out of area placements in mental health services data quality statement 2017. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• NHS England, 2015. Cutting reliance on paper will make patients safer. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, E., 2003. Decision-making in mental health review tribunals. London: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Practice direction first-tier tribunal health education and social care chamber statements and reports in mental health cases. Oct 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, J., et al., 2015. Independent mental health advocacy - the right to be heard: context, values and good practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., 1998. Governing risky individuals: the role of psychiatry in new regimes of control. Psychiatry, psychology and law, 5 (2), 177–195.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, S. P., 2013. Community treatment orders do not reduce hospital readmission in people with psychosis. Evidence based mental health, 16(4), 116. doi:10.1136/eb-2013-101438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Susman, J., 1994. Resolving hospital conflicts: a study on therapeutic jurisprudence. Journal of psychiatry and law, 22 (1), 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• The Centre for Economic Performance, 2012. How mental illness loses out in the NHS: a report by the mental health policy group. London: London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• The Franks Report, 1959. Report of the Committee on Administrative Tribunals and Enquiries Cmnd 218. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• The King’s Fund, 2015. Briefing - mental health under pressure. London: The King’s Fund.
   Google Scholar
• The tribunal procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, education and social care chamber) Rules 2008 (2008 No. 2699) (L. 16) Part 4 Chapter 1 Rule 34.. (2008 No. 2699) (L. 16) Part 4 Chapter 1 Rule 34.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., 2017. Oral and paper tribunal appeals, and the online future. London: UKAJI.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 1996. The psychological consequences of judicial procedures: implications for civil commitment hearings. In: D.B. Wexler and B. Winick, eds. Law in a therapeutic key: developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, D., 1992. Justice, mental health, and therapeutic jurisprudence. Cleveland state law review, 40, 517–526.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, D. and Winick, B., 1991. Essays in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, 2009. Improving health systems and services for mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar