Evaluating the governance of structural funds programmes: The case of community economic development in South Yorkshire

Abstract

Methods for evaluating regional and urban policies have become increasingly sophisticated in recent years. However, this paper argues that the evaluation of Structural Funds programmes has systematically underplayed the effect of governance on both programme design and implementation. This paper uses the role of voluntary and community sector organizations in promoting community economic development initiatives within the European Union's Structural Funds programmes in South Yorkshire as a case study. An argument is made for extending evaluation methods, especially theory-based evaluation, through using multi-level governance as a “theory of change”. A key finding is that to explain how programmes work, evaluators need to consider formal partnership and management arrangements, their traditional focus, but also wider governance structures and the importance of informal policy networks. Such a focus allows for a consideration of issues such as resource mobilization and power.

Acknowledgements

Results obtained from a research project, The Changing Role of the Third Sector in the Governance of Regional Policy (ESRC Project No. R000223297) were utilized in this paper, together with evidence from three successive formal evaluations of Structural Funds programmes in Yorkshire and the Humber in which the authors have participated.