347
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Territorial Impact of the Knowledge Economy: Intangibles and Regional Inequality in Great Britain

&
Pages 1491-1508 | Received 24 Jun 2011, Accepted 03 Apr 2012, Published online: 08 Oct 2012
 

Abstract

Knowledge-based activities are an important source of national and regional competitiveness. In the UK and other European Union countries knowledge industries represent not only one of the fastest growing sources of new jobs, but also account for an increasing share of Gross Value Added (GVA) and exports. Nonetheless, there are also indications that the actual importance of the knowledge economy still remains understated. Within the conventional System of National Accounts, expenditure on intangible assets, such as research and development or human and organizational capital, is not considered either as part of GVA or as investment. In the UK, Marrano et al. (Citation2009) report increased market sector GVA figures by as much as 13% in 2004 after treating intangibles as investment. Considering that expenditures on intangibles vary considerably across regions, it is likely that the territorial impact of this aspect of the knowledge economy has remained largely unreported so far. Spatial inequalities in the investment in intangibles should result in sharper inequalities in regional output. This paper aims to address this issue, first by adjusting the UK regional GVA series for investment in intangibles and second by exploring the trends in regional economic convergence during the period 1991–2004.

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Conference of the Regional Studies Association (RSA) that took place during 27–29 May 2008 in Prague, Czech Republic. The authors thank the participants of the Conference and the two anonymous referees for their comments on the previous versions of this paper. The usual disclaimers apply.

Notes

1 A valuable literature on intangibles that is perhaps somewhat more widely drawn is offered by the collections of Bianchi and Labory (Citation2004), and Hand and Baruch (Citation2003).

2 The authors are grateful to Professor Jonathan Haskel for providing these data.

3 The employment classes derive from the UK Standard Industrial Classification based on the 1992 major revision. The regional employment data come from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Annual Employment Survey Employee Analysis for the years 1991 to 1997 and the ONS Annual Business Inquiry Employee Analysis for the years 1998–2004.

4 It is interesting to note that regional gains in terms of GVA per head are not necessarily associated with Total Factor Productivity gains. This is because intangibles are not only an output, but also an input in the production process (CitationMelachroinos & Spence, 2012).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 622.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.