1,073
Views
73
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Combining Knowledge from Different Sources, Channels and Geographical Scales

&
Pages 2305-2325 | Received 18 Jun 2013, Accepted 14 Aug 2013, Published online: 23 Sep 2013
 

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine conceptually and empirically how innovative firms combine knowledge (1) provided by different sources, (2) accessed at different spatial scales and (3) acquired through different channels. We add to the conceptual debate by contrasting and synthesising the perspectives offered on these issues by four key concepts, namely the local buzz and global pipelines argument, the knowledge-base approach, the notions of Science–Technology–Innovation and Doing–Using–Interacting modes of innovation as well as the regional innovation systems concept. The empirical part of the article contains an analysis of knowledge-sourcing activities employed by 181 firms belonging to the Austrian automotive supplier industry. Our findings reveal that it is, indeed, combinations of knowledge sourced from different partners located at different spatial scales and acquired through different channels that are relevant. However, it is particular combinations that dominate while others are negligible. Austrian automotive supplier firms combine knowledge provided by customers with knowledge inputs from a variety of other sources. Most of the combinations involve the European or global levels combined with the regional and/or national level. Finally, firms combine spillovers with a variety of other channels to acquire innovation-relevant knowledge.

Acknowledgements

We thank Christoph Höglinger for data collection and construction of the database. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers and to our colleague Roman Martin for valuable comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Notes

1. As regards potential non-response bases, we see a certain risk that non-innovative firms were less likely to fill in the questionaire. However, as we are mainly interested in the knowledge sourcing combinations relevant for innovation activities, this potential non-response bias has no effect on our results and findings.

2. Including those types of sources do not change the overall picture presented here.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 622.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.