Abstract
Spatial proximity is credited with numerous virtues in the economic literature. In particular, for a company to be located near other companies is seen as conducive to the development of business relations. Spatial proximity is also considered to contribute to the quality and efficiency of these relations by facilitating face-to-face meetings that foster the exchange of complex knowledge and, in particular, the emergence of innovation. This article explores the notion of spatial proximity in intercompany relations, its capacity to facilitate exchange, as well as the link with the methods of communication employed (information and communication technologies and face-to-face). It is based on a distinction between real proximity (the spatial distance between firms), perceived proximity (the spatial distance as evaluated by the firm itself) and active proximity (spatial proximity that facilitates the exchanges). The data come from a survey conducted in 2008 with more than 2000 firms located in the Brittany region (France). The findings emphasize the relative nature of the notion of spatial proximity and the distinction in some cases between real and active proximities, and show that the positive perception of the role of spatial proximity is sustained by the increased face-to-face contact it entails.
Notes
1 The criteria of representativity are: the location of the firm in the 4 départements of the Brittany region (a département is equivalent to a county) and the size and business sector in each département.
2 Note that using the term “regional” for the scale 50–250 km is a misnomer: if the geographical specificity of the Brittany region (it is a peninsula) implies that this is equivalent for a large number of firms, for firms located at the east of the region, a partner far from 50 to 250 km can be situated in another region. So the reader has to keep in mind that the regional scale corresponds to a distance from 50 to 250 km and not systematically to a location in Brittany.