ABSTRACT
Innovation processes comprise interactive learning mechanisms by combining different knowledge sources. Using a set of 80 exploratory interviews with small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and regional innovation consultants, this paper analyzes the mechanisms through which firms combine an STI (science-technology – innovation) and DUI (learning-by-doing, -using and -interacting) mode of innovation. We show that the innovation mode concept ought to be applied as a continuum of combinations. Thus, SMEs integrate STI-based knowledge into DUI-routines through mechanisms with varying levels of complexity. The described mechanisms differ with respect to their effects on innovativeness, the required absorptive capacities, and costs incurred. Depending on the level of integration, cognitive, organizational and financial barriers impede a combination of innovation modes. At this point, regional innovation consultants can affect a successful combination. We derive implications for innovation policy regarding absorptive capacities in SMEs, showing that policy support extends beyond financial services.
Acknowledgments
Our special thanks go to the research team InDUI as well as the interviewees, for taking their time for our interviews. Furthermore, we would like to thank all our other colleagues for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
The qualitative data are not publicly available due to restrictions. They containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1 Functional division of analytical grids in Germany based on districts and commuting flows.
2 Interview Sample: Goettingen: 10 RICs/ 18 SMEs; Hanover: 12 RICs/ 15 SMEs; East- Thuringia: 9 RICs/ 16 SMEs