Abstract
Student examinees are key stakeholders in large-scale, high-stakes, public examination systems. How they perceive the purpose, comprehend the technical characteristics of testing and how they interpret scores influence their response to the system demands and their preparation for the examinations; this information relates to intended and unintended consequences of testing and is a component of an expanded notion of test validity. The research reported in this paper investigates examinees’ perceptions about the secondary school graduation and university-entrance national exams in Cyprus. Interviews with recent examinees reveal the versatility and complexity of their perceptions about the fairness and appropriateness of the system, which are influenced by design features of the exams and by the local context. There are important, mostly unintended, consequences on their in- and out-of-school experience, on school curricula and on instructional practices. Empirical evidence about consequential aspects of examinations contributes to the validity argument needed to support such programmes.
Notes
1. Such a transformation assumes that the subgroups taking each subject test are roughly equal in their ability distributions.
2. In addition to the public tertiary institutions, there are, currently, five private universities in Cyprus, but not in Greece, which do not use the Pancyprian Exam scores for enrolment purposes. Students in private universities pay for their undergraduate tuition, unlike their counterparts in the public ones.
3. There are national systems for which a choice of examination subjects is not allowed, and the scoring system becomes much simpler and less disputable.
4. Males, who were at the time serving in the army, stated whether they planned on following studies in the departments where they had secured positions.