Validity considerations ensuing from examinees’ perceptions about high-stakes national examinations in Cyprus

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267.10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. F., Malacova, E., Rodeiro, C. L. V., & Shannon, M. (2007). A-level uptake: ‘Crunchier subjects’ and the ‘Cracker effect’. Research Matters, 3, 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 547–560.10.1080/02680931003698544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 15, 3–17.10.1080/09695940701876003
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., McInerney, D. M., & Liem, G. A. D. (2009). Student perspectives of assessment: Considering what assessment means to learners. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 1–21). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. S., & Wollack, J. A. (2006). Test administration, security, scoring, and reporting. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 355–386). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Weiner & H. I. Brown (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Wise, A. E. (1985). Beyond standardization: State standards and school improvement. Elementary School Journal, 85, 315–336.10.1086/esj.1985.85.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklöf, H., & Nyroos, M. (2013). Pupil perceptions of national tests in science: Perceived importance, invested effort, and test anxiety. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 497–510.10.1007/s10212-012-0125-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. (2012). Qualifications, examinations and assessment: Views and perspectives of students in the 14–19 phase on policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 497–512.10.1080/0305764X.2012.733347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., & Lundy, L. (2010). Revisioning assessment through a children’s rights approach: Implications for policy, process and practice. Research Papers in Education, 25, 335–353.10.1080/02671522.2010.498150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Entwistle, A. (1991). Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: The student experience and its implications. Higher Education, 22, 205–227.10.1007/BF00132288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Haertel, E. H. (2013a). How is testing supposed to improve schooling? Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 11(1–2), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Haertel, E. H. (2013b). Getting the help we need. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 84–90.10.1111/jedm.2013.50.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, A., & Spours, K. (2003). Beyond A levels: Curriculum 2000 and the reform of 14–19 qualifications. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, A., & Spours, K. (2005). The learner experience of curriculum 2000: Implications for the reform of 14–19 education in England. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 101–118.10.1080/0268093042000322856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, A., & Spours, K. (2008). Education and training 14–19: Curriculum, qualifications and organisation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 761–796.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73.10.1111/jedm.2013.50.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, D. A., & Todd Rogers, W. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of large-scale assessment programs within low-stakes accountability frameworks. International Journal of Testing, 11, 122–143.10.1080/15305058.2011.552748
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Testing for accountability in K-12. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 531–578). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Lamprianou, I. (2009). Comparability of examination standards between subjects: An international perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 205–226.10.1080/03054980802649360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamprianou, I. (2012). Unintended consequences of forced policy-making in high stakes examinations: The case of the Republic of Cyprus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 19, 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice is not enough’: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child for education. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 927–942.10.1080/01411920701657033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maag Merki, K. (2011). Effects of the implementation of state-wide exit exams on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 196–205.10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997) Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (3rd Internet ed., pp. 39–58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelides, M. P. (2010, July). High stakes assessments and their impact as perceived by high school teachers. Poster presented at the 7th Conference of the International Test Commission, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. (2010). Analytika Programmata Prodimotikis, Dimotikis, kai Mesis Ekpaidefsis [Curricula of kindergarten, elementary, and secondary education], Volume A. Nicosia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. (2014). Odigos Pagkyprion Exetaseon [Guide to the Pancyprian Examinations 2014], Volume A. Nicosia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K., & Joan, T. F. H. (2002). Testing to destruction: A problem in a small state. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9, 289–317.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., Lundy, L., Emerson, L., & Kerr, K. (2013). Children’s perceptions of primary science assessment in England and Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 585–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2012). Making sense of decades of debate on inter-subject comparability in England. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19, 251–273.
   Google Scholar
• Noguera, P. A. (2007). How listening to students can help schools to improve. Theory Into Practice, 46, 205–211.10.1080/14241270701402165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2008). Success in science. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, E., & Banks, J. (2012). High stakes testing and student perspectives on teaching and learning in the Republic of Ireland. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24, 283–306.10.1007/s11092-012-9154-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practice. In L. S. Hamilton, B. M. Stecher, & S. P. Klein (Eds.), Making sense of test-based accountability in education (pp. 79–100). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (1997). Student-centered classroom assessment (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 331–347.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. (2009). Developing assessment literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 21–36.10.1017/S0267190509090035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, D. (2005). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching: A case study using insights from testing and innovation theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. (2005). Low examinee effort in low-stakes assessment: Problems and possible solutions. Educational Assessment, 10(1), 1–17.10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, L. F., & Smith, J. K. (1995). The consequence of consequence: Motivation, anxiety, and test performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 227–242.10.1207/s15324818ame0803_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, X. (2010). How do we go about investigating test fairness? Language Testing, 27, 147–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. (2008). Students’ perception of the CET4 listening and test preparation practices – Implications for washback. Research Studies in Education, 6, 32–47.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. (2011). Is test taker perception of assessment related to construct validity? International Journal of Testing, 11, 324–348.10.1080/15305058.2011.589018
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, R. (2006). Higher education admissions testing. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 647–680). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
   Google Scholar