Bonded concrete overlay of asphalt mechanical-empirical design procedure

Abstract

Bonded concrete overlays of asphalt pavements (BCOAs) are becoming a common rehabilitation technique used for distressed hot mix asphalt (HMA) roadways. The original design procedures were based primarily on data from instrumented pavements and finite element modelling. They were governed by the assumption that the failure mechanism was a function of the overlay thickness. However, field observations have indicated that the actual failure modes are dictated by slab size. The newly developed Bonded Concrete Overlay of Asphalt Mechanistic-Empirical design procedure (BCOA-ME) presented here is valid for overlays that are between 2.5 and 6.5 in (64–154 mm), and includes five primary enhancements to the Portland Cement Association and Colorado Department of Transportation procedures that have been traditionally used: 1.) the failure mode is dictated by the joint spacing; 2.) a new structural model for longitudinal cracking for 6-ft × 6-ft (1.8 m × 1.8 m) concrete overlays has been developed to better predict the critical stresses; 3.) the stress adjustment factors have been calibrated with performance data; 4.) the equivalent temperature gradients used as design input are defined based on the pavement structure and geographical location of the project; and 5.) the effect of temperature change on underlying HMA stiffness is considered. Finally, validation studies were completed on the new procedure and comparisons made between the revised procedure and actual performance data for five separate projects showed reasonable results. A sensitivity analysis also revealed that the predicted thickness obtained using the revised procedure was sensitive to HMA thickness, the modulus of rupture of the Portland cement concrete, and the level of traffic, as would be expected.

Keywords:

• Bonded concrete overlay
• pavement rehabilitation
• design procedure
• mechanical-empirical
• whitetopping

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Dakota and Texas Departments of Transportation. These states are all participating in the FHWA Pooled Fund Study TPF 5-165 under which this work was performed. The authors would also like to express their sincere appreciation to Mr Thomas Burnham of the Minnesota Department of Transportation for all of his efforts in making this project possible.