723
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Field-Based Evaluation of Two-Tiered Instruction for Enhancing Kindergarten Phonological Awareness

, , , , &
Pages 726-752 | Published online: 13 Oct 2008
 

Abstract

Research Findings: This study reports on the outcomes of a multisite, two-tiered, response-to-intervention instructional model for delivering phonological awareness instruction and intervention to kindergartners. Fifty-seven kindergartners from 3 classrooms participated in a supplemental phonological awareness program, and 56 kindergartners from 3 classrooms received the prevailing school-adopted literacy curriculum. All children in the supplemental condition received supplemental classroom-based phonological awareness instruction in addition to the adopted literacy curriculum. At mid-year, 6 low literacy achievers were identified in each supplemental classroom (n = 18) to participate in an additional 12-week small-group intervention. The classroom-based supplemental curriculum did not produce statistically significant gains for typically achieving children on measures of letter–sound knowledge, word recognition, or developmental spelling. However, an add-on tier of supplemental instruction exerted a substantial advantage for low-achieving children on a measure of developmental spelling. Practice or Policy: Results suggest that a 2-tiered intervention model provides an effective means for improving the literacy outcomes of low-achieving kindergarten children.

Notes

aPercent free/reduced lunch reported for the participating classrooms.

bPercentage of participants receiving special education services.

cPercentage of children currently repeating kindergarten.

dWhether a school received Title I funds in the project year. Typically schools are eligible for Title I funds if more than 45% of children are eligible for free/reduced lunch. School B received Title I funds in the previous school year.

1Although West Virginia has little racial diversity, low income and low educational achievement are far more prevalent than the national averages. The minority population in West Virginia is less than 5% (national average = 25%). The poverty rate is about 18% as compared to 12% nationally; 49% of children in West Virginia live in low-income households, and about half of those children live in poverty. In 2002, 50% of K–12 students in West Virginia qualified for free/reduced lunch. Only 75% of adults in West Virginia have graduated from high school (national average = 80%), and only 15% have at least a bachelor's degree (national average = 24%; Economic Research Service, 2005; National Center for Children in Poverty, 2003; U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

2Children were also administered a seventh subtest from the PALS-K instrument, Concept of Word. Because Invernizzi (personal communication, October 12, 2002) indicated potential problems with reliability, this subtest was not included in the present analyses.

aFall and spring spelling measures differed in terms of maximum possible score (20 and 48 points, respectively).

bFall sum score used as covariate.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 290.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.