ABSTRACT
Pornography is spreading more and more widely due to websites, applications, and social media. It has attracted the attention of a large number of researchers who are sometimes divided on the impact of pornography. However, the relationship between pornography and sexual violence myths has received little scholarly attention in China. Based on the 3AM model and previous research, the study examined hostile sexism (HS) as a mediator and perceived realism as a moderator in the links between pornography use frequency and sexual violence myths in a sample of Chinese men (N = 376). The results showed that although pornography use and sexual violence myths did not directly correlate with one another, there was an indirect correlation through HS. Further, perceived realism moderated the relationship between pornography use frequency and HS. When participants’ perceived realism was high (i.e. +1 SD), the indirect effect of HS was strong; when participants’ perceived realism was low (i.e. −1 SD), the indirect effect of HS was not significant. Taken together, the findings reveal the cross-cultural consistency of the 3AM theory in China, and the findings provide new insight into the potential impact of pornography on sexism. At the same time, the results suggest an increase in appropriate education and interventions to reduce the incidence of sexual violence.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Availability of data and material
Study data is available upon request.
Code availability
Model code is available upon request.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
All the authors have seen and approved the manuscript for publication.
Ethics approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Notes
1. The results for including age and education were similar to those for not including.