Evolution Of Clonal Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Aplastic Anemia

Abstract

Prior to the introduction of effective therapies, the high mortality rates of severe aplastic anemia (AA) precluded recognition of late complications of this disease. Once the survival of AA improved, observation of clonal evolution raised questions as to whether the development of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a part of the extended natural history of the disease or is related to the therapies applied. Clinical features of myelodysplasia and AA can overlap, and typical MDS may evolve as a complication of AA. Common pathophysiologic elements operate in these diseases and are subject to many studies and theories as to what mechanisms in AA may lead to the late evolution of MDS. Similarly, AA has been hypothesized to be a reflection of an over-reactive immune response triggered by the appearance of genetically altered and/or phenotypically abnormal dysplastic clones. Hypocellular variants of myelodysplasia and responsiveness of certain forms of MDS to immunosuppressive regimens serve as the most appealing examples of the intricate and close pathophysiologic relationship of this disease with AA. The diagnosis of clonal evolution in the course of AA can be obvious if secondary cytopenia involves hypercellularity and a high percentage of blasts. In addition, the occurrence of a new karyotypic defect objectively heralds the progression of disease to MDS. However, the diagnostic imprecision of dysplasia recognition in the context of marrow hypocellularity, inability to obtain informative cytogenetics, and a high proportion of MDS cases with normal karyoptype have hampered studies designed to determine the frequency and timing of MDS evolution in AA. In addition, the diagnostic criteria and definitions used are not unified. While some centers recognize that the abnormal karyotype does not preclude the diagnosis of AA; in others, the diagnosis of AA includes the presence of normal karyoptype. Many typical features of dysplastic evolution in AA have been clarified. For example, karyotypes most frequently encountered in MDS secondary to AA involve chromosomes 6, 7 and 8. The evolution rates seem to be in the range of 10 – 15% in 10 years, but there are no predictive clues as to which patients are at greatest risk for this complication. Study of the mechanisms of clonal evolution in AA may help understand the pathophysiology of other forms of MDS and leukemia and also the mechanisms of antileukemic surveillance. Clinically, identification of patients at increased risk for clonal complications may influence the choice of therapies applied.

• Aplastic anemia
• Myelodysplasia
• Karyotypic analysis
• Clonal evolution