254
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exposure to Unethical Career Events: Effects on Decision Making, Climate, and Socialization

, , , , , & show all
Pages 351-378 | Published online: 16 Sep 2009
 

Abstract

An implicit goal of many interventions intended to enhance integrity is to minimize peoples' exposure to unethical events. The intent of the present effort was to examine if exposure to unethical practices in the course of one's work is related to ethical decision making. Accordingly, 248 doctoral students in the biological, health, and social sciences were asked to complete a field appropriate measure of ethical decision making. In addition, they were asked to complete measures examining the perceived acceptability of unethical events and a measure examining perceptions of ethical climate. When these criterion measures were correlated with a measure examining the frequency with which they had been exposed to unethical events in their day-to-day work, it was found that event exposure was strongly related to ethical decision making but less strongly related to climate perceptions and perceptions of event acceptability. However, these relationships were moderated by level of experience. The implications of these findings for practices intended to improve ethics are discussed.

Notes

a N = 246.

b n = 149.

c n = 97.

d n = 246.

a R 1 = .27*, R 2= .33*.

b R 1 = .39*, R 2= .42*.

c R 1 = .18, R 2= .27.

dValues for regression weights for controls are full, less, and more from left to right.

e R 1 = .35*, R 2= .41*.

f R 1 = .45**, R 2= .44**.

g R 1 = .32*, R 2= .50**.

h R 1 = .30**, R 2= .38**.

i R 1 = .36**, R 2= .48**.

j R 1 = .32*, R 2= .42*.

k R 1 = .25**, R 2= .35**.

l R 1 = .44**, R 2= .51**.

m R 1 = .12, R 2= .29.

*p < .05.

**p < .01.

p < .10.

a R 1 = .15, R 2 = .28*.

b R 1 = .13, R 2 = .27.

c R 1 = .24, R 2 = .51**.

dValues for regression weights for controls are full, less, and more from left to right.

e R 1 = .31**, R 2 = .44**.

f R 1 = .39*, R 2 = .46**.

g R 1 = .23, R 2 = .50**.

h R 1 = .12, R 2 = .21.

i R 1 = .12, R 2 = .19.

j R 1 = .30, R 2 = .44*.

k R 1 = .17, R 2 = .25.

l R 1 = .24, R 2 = .34.

m R 1 = .39**, R 2 = .38.

*p < .05.

**p < .01.

p < .10.

a R 1 = .13, R 2 = .21; n = 133.

b R 1 = .44*, R 2 = .46; n = 49.

c R 1 = .23, R 2 = .26; n = 84.

dValues for regression weights for controls are full, less, and more from left to right.

e R 1 = .26, R 2 = .39*; n = 133.

f R 1 = .24, R 2 = .38; n = 49.

g R 1 = .39*, R 2 = .47*; n = 84.

h R 1 = .15, R 2 = .24; n = 133.

i R 1 = .29, R 2 = .35; n = 49.

j R 1 = .15, R 2 = .34; n = 84.

k R 1 = .20, R 2 = .33; n = 133.

l R 1 = .34, R 2 = .48; n = 49.

m R 1 = .40**, R 2 = .44*; n = 84.

*p < .05.

**p < .01.

p < .10.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 349.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.