782
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Private Support, Public Alienation: Whistle-Blowers and the Paradox of Social Support

&
Pages 213-237 | Published online: 25 Aug 2013
 

Abstract

Blowing the whistle on organizational wrongdoing is a stressful process, complicated by the prevalence of interpersonal and organizational retaliation, including the possibility of slander, physical intimidation, and death threats. This study provides insight on how whistle-blowers experience and characterize social support throughout the whistle-blowing process. Qualitative analysis of 13 in-depth interviews with whistle-blowers in the collegiate sports industry revealed whistle-blowers experienced reduced social support as a result of blowing the whistle. Problematic conditions related to whistle-blowers' experience of social support included the duality of private support but public alienation, diminished size of social support networks, and apathy from the affected organizations. Although whistle-blowers received some support from friends and colleagues in private settings, those same individuals avoided the whistle-blower in public contexts. Themes of private support/public alienation, diminished support network, and institutional apathy emerged from the data. Whistle-blowers responded through cathartic engagement with the media and seeking community amongst fellow whistle-blowers in an effort to augment public social support. Organizational members stigmatized whistle-blowers for speaking out against the organization, reducing whistle-blowers' experience of social support. Contextual factors negatively affected whistle-blowers' experience of social support, including the heightened role of sports on campus and the presence of external stakeholders in the form of fans and alumni. Results indicate that social support is an integral component of the whistle-blowing process. The authors discuss theoretical and practical implications, including the influences of stigma, taint, and social alienation that “mark” whistle-blowers.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to three anonymous reviewers, whose constructive critiques helped to shape this article into its present form. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2012 annual meeting of the National Communication Association.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Joseph McGlynn

Joseph McGlynn III (MA, University of North Texas) is a doctoral student in the Department of Communication Studies, University of Texas at Austin.

Brian K. Richardson

Brian K. Richardson (PhD, The University of Texas at Austin) is an Associate Professor at the University of North Texas.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.