Comparison of global and mode of action-based models for aquatic toxicity

Abstract

The ability to estimate aquatic toxicity is a critical need for ecological risk assessment and chemical regulation. The consensus in the literature is that mode of action (MOA) based toxicity models yield the most toxicologically meaningful and, theoretically, the most accurate results. In this study, a two-step prediction methodology was developed to estimate acute aquatic toxicity from molecular structure. In the first step, one-against-the-rest linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were used to predict the MOA. The LDA models were able to predict the MOA with 85.8–88.8% accuracy for broad and specific MOAs, respectively. In the second step, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model corresponding to the predicted MOA was used to predict the acute aquatic toxicity value. The MOA-based approach was found to yield similar external prediction accuracy (r² = 0.529–0.632) to a single global MLR model (r² = 0.551–0.562) fit to the entire training set. Overall, the global hierarchical clustering approach yielded a higher combination of accuracy and prediction coverage (r² = 0.572, coverage = 99.3%) than the other approaches. Utilizing multiple two-dimensional chemical descriptors in MLR models yielded comparable results to using only the octanol–water partition coefficient (log K_ow).

Keywords:

• mode of action
• quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR)
• linear discriminant analysis (LDA)
• multiple linear regression
• aquatic toxicity
• octanol–water partition coefficient

Acknowledgement

The opinions expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not represent the policies or opinions of the US EPA.