Comparison of global and mode of action-based models for aquatic toxicity

References

• T.I. Netzeva, M. Pavan, and A.P. Worth, Review of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships for acute aquatic toxicity, QSAR Comb. Sci. 27 (2008), pp. 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• R. Benigni and A.M. Richard, QSARS of mutagens and carcinogens: Two case studies illustrating problems in the construction of models for noncongeneric chemicals, Mutat. Res.-Genet. Tox. 371 (1996), pp. 29–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.W. Schultz, G.D. Sinks, and A.P. Bearden, QSAR in aquatic toxicology: A mechanism of action approach comparing toxic potency to Pimephales promelas, Tetrahymena pyriformis, and Vibrio fischeri, in Comparative QSAR, J. Devillers, ed., Taylor & Francis, New York, 1998, pp. 51–109.
   Google Scholar
• S.G. Abernethy, D. MacKay, and L.S. McCarty, ‘Volume fraction’ correlation for narcosis in aquatic organisms: The key role of partitioning, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 7 (1988), pp. 469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.T.D. Cronin and T.W. Schultz, Structure-toxicity relationships for phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis, Chemosphere 32 (1996), pp. 1453–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.G. Mekenyan and G.D. Veith, Relationships between descriptors for hydrophobicity and soft electrophilicity in predicting toxicity, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1 (1993), pp. 335–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H. Yuan, Y.-Y. Wang, and Y.-Y. Cheng, Mode of action-based local QSAR modeling for the prediction of acute toxicity in the fathead minnow, J. Molec. Graph. Model. 26 (2007), pp. 327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.F. Zheng and A. Tropsha, Novel variable selection quantitative structure-property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 40 (2000), pp. 185–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Cassotti, D. Ballabio, V. Consonni, A. Mauri, I.V. Tetko, and R. Todeschini, Prediction of acute aquatic toxicity toward Daphnia magna by using the GA-kNN method, Altern. Lab. Anim. 42 (2014), pp. 31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.M. Martin, P. Harten, R. Venkatapathy, S. Das, and D.M. Young, A hierarchical clustering methodology for the estimation of toxicity, Toxicol. Mech. Method. 18 (2008), pp. 251–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.X. Xue, R.S. Zhang, H.X. Liu, X.J. Yao, M.C. Liu, Z.D. Hu, and B.T. Fan, An Accurate QSPR study of O–H bond dissociation energy in substituted phenols based on support vector machines, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 44 (2004), pp. 669–677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D.V. Eldred, C.L. Weikel, P.C. Jurs, and K.L.E. Kaiser, Prediction of fathead minnow acute toxicity of organic compounds from molecular structure, Chem Res. Toxicol. 12 (1999), pp. 670–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Papa, F. Villa, and P. Gramatica, Statistically validated QSARs, based on theoretical descriptors, for modeling aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals in Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow), J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45 (2005), pp. 1256–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Castillo-Garit, Y. Marrero-Ponce, J. Escobar, F. Torrens, and R. Rotondo, A novel approach to predict aquatic toxicity from molecular structure, Chemosphere 73 (2008), pp. 415–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.F. Contrera, E.J. Matthews, and R.D. Benz, Predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using molecular structural similarity and E-state indices, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 38 (2003), pp. 243–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.L.E. Kaiser and S.P. Niculescu, Using probabilistic neural networks to model the toxicity of chemicals to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas): A study based on 865 chemicals, Chemosphere 38 (1999), pp. 3237–3245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.M. Martin and D.M. Young, Prediction of the acute toxicity (96-h LC50) of organic compounds to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) using a group contribution method, Chem Res. Toxicol. 14 (2001), pp. 1378–1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Öberg, A general structure-property relationship to predict the enthalpy of vaporisation at ambient temperatures, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007), pp. 127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Öberg, A QSAR for baseline toxicity: Validation, domain of application, and prediction, Chem Res. Toxicol. 17 (2004), pp. 1630–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Cherkasov, Inductive QSAR descriptors. Distinguishing compounds with antibacterial activity by artificial neural networks, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 6 (2005), pp. 63–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory (VCCLAB), Associative Neural Network, VCCLAB, Munich, 2007; software available at http://www.vcclab.org/lab/asnn/.
   Google Scholar
• L. He and P.C. Jurs, Assessing the reliability of QSAR model's predictions, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 23 (2005), pp. 503–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Könemann, Quantitative structure-activity relationships in fish toxicity studies Part 1: Relationship for 50 industrial pollutants, Toxicology 19 (1981), pp. 209–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Enviromental Protection Agency (US EPA), Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.11. (2014), US EPA, Washington DC; software available at http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuitedl.htm.
   Google Scholar
• C.L. Russom, S.P. Bradbury, S.J. Broderius, D.E. Hammermeister, and R.A. Drummond, Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales Promelas), Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 (1997), pp. 948–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.T.D. Cronin, A.O. Aptula, J.C. Duffy, T.I. Netzeva, P.H. Rowe, I.V. Valkova, and T. Wayne Schultz, Comparative assessment of methods to develop QSARs for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis, Chemosphere 49 (2002), pp. 1201–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Claeys, F. Iaccino, C.R. Janssen, P. Van Sprang, and F. Verdonck, Development and validation of a quantitative structure–activity relationship for chronic narcosis to fish, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 32 (2013), pp. 2217–2225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nendza and M. Müller, Discriminating toxicant classes by mode of action: 2. Physico-chemical descriptors, Quant. Struct.-Act. Rel, 19 (2000), pp. 581–598.
   Google Scholar
• A.O. Aptula, T.I. Netzeva, I.V. Valkova, M.T.D. Cronin, T.W. Schultz, R. Kühne, and G. Schüürmann, Multivariate discrimination between modes of toxic action of phenols, Quant. Struct.-Act. Rel, 21 (2002), pp. 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• G. Schüürmann, A.O. Aptula, R. Kühne, and R.-U. Ebert, Stepwise discrimination between four modes of toxic action of phenols in the Tetrahymena pyriformis assay, Chem Res. Toxicol. 16 (2003), pp. 974–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Niu, Y. Jin, W. Lu, and G. Li, Predicting toxic action mechanisms of phenols using AdaBoost Learner, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 96 (2009), pp. 43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Spycher, M. Nendza, and J. Gasteiger, Comparison of different classification methods applied to a mode of toxic action data set, QSAR Comb. Sci. 23 (2004), pp. 77–791.
   Google Scholar
• U. Norinder, P. Lidén, and H. Boström, Discrimination between modes of toxic action of phenols using rule based methods, Mol. Divers. 10 (2006), pp. 207–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.J. Yao, A. Panaye, J.P. Doucet, H.F. Chen, R.S. Zhang, B.T. Fan, M.C. Liu, and Z.D. Hu, Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks, Anal. Chim. Acta 535 (2005), pp. 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ren, Predicting three narcosis mechanisms of aquatic toxicity, Toxicol. Lett. 133 (2002), pp. 127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Michielan, L. Pireddu, M. Floris, and S. Moro, Support vector machine (SVM) as alternative tool to assign acute aquatic toxicity warning labels to chemicals, Mol. Inform. 29 (2010), pp. 51–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C. Basak, G.D. Grunwald, G.E. Host, G.J. Niemi, and S.P. Bradbury, A comparative study of molecular similarity, statistical, and neural methods for predicting toxic modes of action, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17 (1998), pp. 1056–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.M. Martin, C.M. Grulke, D.M. Young, C.L. Russom, N.Y. Wang, C.R. Jackson, and M.G. Barron, Prediction of aquatic toxicity mode of action using linear discriminant and random forest models, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53 (2013), pp. 2229–2239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Spycher, E. Pellegrini, and J. Gasteiger, Use of structure descriptors to discriminate between modes of toxic action of phenols, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45 (2005), pp. 200–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Un Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), ASTER (Assessment Tools for the Evaluation of Risk), US EPA, Washington DC, 2012; software available at http://www.epa.gov/med/Prods_Pubs/aster.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC), IRAC MoA Classification Scheme, IRAC International MoA Working Group, 2012; software available at http://www.irac-online.org/eClassification/.
   Google Scholar
• L. Eriksson, J.S. Jaworska, A.P. Worth, M.T.D. Cronin, R.M. McDowell, and P. Gramatica, Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs, Environ. Health Persp. 111 (2003), pp. 1361–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.C. Montgomery, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• L.B. Kier and L.H. Hall, Molecule Structure Description: The Electrotopological State, Academic Press, New York, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Talete, Dragon Version 6, Talete SRL, Milan, Italy, 2006; software available at http://www.talete.mi.it/products/dragon_description.htm.
   Google Scholar
• H.J.M. Verhaar, C.J. van Leeuwen, and J.L.M. Hermens, Classifying environmental pollutants. 1: Structure-activity relationships for prediction of aquatic toxicity, Chemosphere 25 (1992), pp. 471–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan, and J.J. Wendoloski, Prediction of hydrophilic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: An analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods, J. Phys. Chem. 102 (1998), pp. 3762–3772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zhu, T.M. Martin, L. Ye, A. Sedykh, D.M. Young, and A. Tropsha, Quantitative structure−activity relationship modeling of rat acute toxicity by oral exposure, Chem Res. Toxicol. 22 (2009), pp. 1913–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar