Peer-led, transformative learning approaches increase classroom engagement in care self-management classes during inpatient rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate effects of revised education classes on classroom engagement during inpatient rehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D).

Design: Multiple-baseline, quasi-experimental design with video recorded engagement observations during conventional and revised education classes; visual and statistical analysis of difference in positive engagement responses observed in classes using each approach.

Participants/Setting: 81 patients (72% male, 73% white, mean age 36 SD 15.6) admitted for SCI/D inpatient rehabilitation in a non-profit rehabilitation hospital, who attended one or more of 33 care self-management education classes that were video recorded. All study activities were approved by the host facility institutional review board.

Intervention: Conventional nurse-led self-management classes were replaced with revised peer-led classes incorporating approaches to promote transformative learning. Revised classes were introduced across three subject areas in a step-wise fashion over 15 weeks.

Outcome Measure: Positive engagement responses (asking questions, participating in discussion, gesturing, raising hand, or otherwise noting approval) were documented from video recordings of 14 conventional and 19 revised education classes.

Results: Significantly higher average (per patient per class) positive engagement responses were observed in the revised compared to conventional classes (p=0.008).

Conclusion: Redesigning SCI inpatient rehabilitation care self-management classes to promote transformative learning increased patient engagement. Additional research is needed to examine longer term outcomes and replicability in other settings.

Keywords:

• Rehabilitation
• Spinal cord injuries
• Peer group
• Education
• Care self-management
• Mentoring

Acknowledgement

All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the PCORI, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee, or of the Robert W. Woodruff Foundation.

Disclaimer statements

Contributors None.

Declaration of interest None.

Conflicts of interest None.

Ethics approval None.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award # IH-12-11-5106 and the Robert W. Woodruff Foundation.