Peer-led, transformative learning approaches increase classroom engagement in care self-management classes during inpatient rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury

References

• Emerich L, Parsons K, Stein A. Competent care for persons with spinal cord injury and dysfunction in acute inpatient rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehab. 2012;18(2):149–66. doi: 10.1310/sci1802-149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Bladder management for adults with spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Neurogenic bowel management in adults with spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Respiratory management following spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• van Wyk K, Backwell A, Townson A. A narrative literature review to direct spinal cord injury patient education programming. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehab. 2015;21(1):499–560.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow J. Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Dubouloz C, King J, Ashe B, Paterson B, Chevrier J, Moldoveanu. M. The process of transformation in rehabilitation: What does it look like? International J Therapy and Rehab. 2010;17(11):604–13. doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2010.17.11.79541
   Google Scholar
• Barclay-Goddard R, King J, Dubouloz C, Schwartz C. Building on transformative learning and response shift theory to investigate health-related quality of life changes over time in individuals with chronic health conditions and disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(2):214–20. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig K, Gonzalez V. The integration of theory with practice: a twelve year case study. Health Educ Quarterly. 1992;19(3):355–68. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrison D, Kanuka H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2004;7:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, Sobel DS, Brown BW, Jr, Bandura A, et al. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care. 2001;39(11):1217–23. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Jr, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: A randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths C, Motlib J, Azad A, Ramsay J, Eldridge S, Feder G, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a lay-led self-management program for Bangladeshi patients with chronic disease. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(520):831–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson G, et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long term conditions: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:254–61. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.053538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerant A, Moore M, Lorig K, Franks P. Perceived control moderated the self-efficacy-enhancing effects of a chronic illness self-management intervention. Chronic Illn. 2008;4(3):173–82. doi: 10.1177/1742395308089057
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olinzock B. A model for assessing learning readiness for self-direction of care in individuals with spinal cord injuries: A qualitative study. SCI Nurs. 2004;21(2):69074.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey J, Dijkers MP, Gassaway J, Thomas J, Lingefelt P, Kreider SED, et al. Relationship of nursing education and care management inpatient rehabilitation interventions and patient characteristics to outcomes following spinal cord injury rehabilitation: The SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(6):593–610. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis S, Freed R, Heller N, Burch G. Does student engagement affect learning? An empirical investigation of student involvement theory. Academy Business Research Journal. 2015;2:8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bonet G, Walters B. High impact practices: Student engagement and retention. College Student Journal. 2016;50(2):224–35.
   Google Scholar
• Baer D, Wolf M, Risley T. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Applied Behav Analysis. 1968;1(1):91–7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J. Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(4):510–50. doi: 10.1037/a0029312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin A, Kopel S. On resolving ambiguities of the multiple baseline design: Problems and recommendations. Behavior Therapy. 1975;6(5):601–8. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(75)80181-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins N, Sanson-Fisher R, Shakeshift A, D’Este C, Green L. The multiple baseline design for evaluating population-based research. Amer J Preventive Med. 2007;33(2):162–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd Center. myShepherdConnection.org. Available from http://www.myshepherdconnection.org/sci. Accessed March 3, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler M, Levin J. Regulated randomization: A potentially sharper analytic tool for the multiple-baseline design. Psych Methods. 1998;3(2):206–17. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte I, Onghena P. Randomization tests for multiple-baseline designs: An extension of the SCRT-R package. Behavior Research Methods. 2009;41(2):477–85. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker R, Vannest K, Davis J. Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification. 2011;35(4):1–20. doi: 10.1177/0145445511399147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs T, Mastropieri M. Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification. 1998;22:221–42. doi: 10.1177/01454455980223001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice. Addressing new challenges facing nursing education: Solutions for a transforming healthcare environment. Eighth Annual Report to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Congress. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier T, Wilhelm T. Use of humor to enhance learning: Bull’s eye or off the mark. Amer J Pharm Educ. 2014;78(2):Article 27. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore M, Terrell S, Joyce L. What does person-centered planning mean for the IL paradigm? Paper presented at: National Council on Independent Living. Washington, DC; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor M, Aiken L, Kurtzman E, Olds D, Hirschman K. The Importance of transitional care in achieving health reform. Health Affairs. 2011;30(4):746–54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbrook R. Health care and the American recovery and reinvestment act. New Engl J Med. 2009;360:1057–60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0900665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Index for Excerpt from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; 2009. Available from https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/hitech_act_excerpt_from_arra_with_index.pdf. Accessed January 24, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• CARF International. Medical Rehabilitation Standards. Tucson, AZ: Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Alimoglu M, Sarac D, Alparslan D, Karakas A, Altintas L. An observation tool for instructor and student behaviors to measure in-class learner engagement: a validation study. Med Educ Online. 2014;19:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar