525
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Modeling and simulation of continuous powder blending applied to a continuous direct compression process

, , , , &
Pages 1097-1107 | Received 24 Aug 2017, Accepted 24 Dec 2017, Published online: 17 Jan 2018
 

Abstract

Continuous manufacturing techniques are increasingly being adopted in the pharmaceutical industry and powder blending is a key operation for solid-dosage tablets. A modeling methodology involving axial and radial tanks-in-series flowsheet models is developed to describe the residence time distribution (RTD) and blend uniformity of a commercial powder blending system. Process data for a six-component formulation processed in a continuous direct compression line (GEA Pharma Systems) is used to test the methodology. Impulse tests were used to generate experimental RTDs which are used along with parameter estimation to determine the number of axial tanks in the flowsheet. The weighted residual from the parameter estimation was less than the χ2 value at a 95% confidence indicating a good fit between the model and measured data. In-silico impulse tests showed the tanks-in-series modeling methodology could successfully describe the RTD behavior of the blenders along with blend uniformity through the use of radial tanks. The simulation output for both impulse weight percentage and blend uniformity were within the experimentally observed variance.

Acknowledgements

A license for the gSOLIDS process modeling software has been provided by Process Systems Enterprise (Ltd.) for the simulation work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Process Systems Enterprise, London, UK; www.psenterprise.com

Additional information

Funding

This work was financially supported by the USFDA cooperative research project [5U01FD005294], Process Modeling and Assessment Tools for Simulation, Risk Management and design space development of integrated pharmaceutical manufacturing processes. The project is also partially supported by Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. The authors would like to thank Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ USA and USFDA for funding the project and providing the dataset used in the modeling work.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 523.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.