Modeling and simulation of continuous powder blending applied to a continuous direct compression process

References

• Barrasso D, Tamrakar A, Ramachandran R. 2014. A reduced order PBM – ANN model of a multi-scale PBM – DEM description of a wet granulation process. Chem Eng Sci. 119:319–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukouvala F, Gao Y, Muzzio F, Ierapetritou MG. 2013. Reduced-order discrete element method modeling. Chem Eng Sci. 95:12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukouvala F, Niotis V, Ramachandran R, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG. 2012. An integrated approach for dynamic flowsheet modeling and sensitivity analysis of a continuous tablet manufacturing process. Comput Chem Eng. 42:30–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrich CJ, Mutsers SMP, Larochette M, Graebling D, Nasri D, Léonardi F, Mahmoudi S, Seville JPK, Baeyens J, Nikitine C, et al. 2009. On the residence time distribution in reactors with non-uniform velocity profiles: the horizontal stirred bed reactor for polypropylene production. J Supercrit Fluids. 44:5777–5793.
   Google Scholar
• Engisch W, Muzzio F. 2016. Using residence time distributions (RTDs) to address the traceability of raw materials in continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing. J Pharm Innov. 11:64–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis P, Von Lieres E, Haynes CA. 2011. Zonal rate model for stacked membrane chromatography. I: Characterizing solute dispersion under flow-through conditions. J. Chromatogr A. 1218:5071–5078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG. 2012. Optimizing continuous powder mixing processes using periodic section modeling. Chem Eng Sci. 80:70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Vanarase A, Muzzio F, Ierapetritou M. 2011. Characterizing continuous powder mixing using residence time distribution. Chem Eng Sci. 66:417–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Ganjyal GM, Jones DD, Hanna MA. 2006. Digital image processing for measurement of residence time distribution in a laboratory extruder. J Food Eng. 75:237–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent BFC. 2006. Scaling factors in granular flow-analysis of experimental and simulations results. Chem Eng Sci. 61:4138–4146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent BFC, Bridgwater J. 2002. Influence of agitator design on powder flow. Chem Eng Sci. 57:3781–3793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SL, O’Connor TF, Yang X, Cruz CN, Chatterjee S, Madurawe RD, Moore CMV, Yu LX, Woodcock J. 2015. Modernizing pharmaceutical manufacturing: from batch to continuous production. J Pharm Innov. 10:191–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenspiel O. 1999. Chemical reaction engineering, 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi S, Seville JPK, Baeyens J. 2010. The residence time distribution and mixing of the gas phase in the riser of a circulating fluidized bed. Powder Technol. 203:322–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markström P, Berguerand N, Lyngfelt A. 2010. The application of a multistage-bed model for residence-time analysis in chemical-looping combustion of solid fue. Chem Eng Sci. 65:5055–5066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikitine C, Rodier E, Sauceau M, Fages J. 2009. Residence time distribution of a pharmaceutical grade polymer melt in a single screw extrusion process. Chem Eng Res Des. 87:809–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DJ, Fan X. 2008. Positron emission particle tracking-Application and labelling techniques. Particuology. 6:16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portillo PM, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG. 2008. Using compartment modeling to investigate mixing behavior of a continuous mixer. J Pharm Innov. 3:161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Portillo PM, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG. 2007. Hybrid DEM-compartment modeling approach for granular mixing. AIChE J. 53:119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portillo PM, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG. 2006. Characterizing powder mixing processes utilizing compartment. Int J Pharm. 320:14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Portillo PM, Vanarase AU, Ingram A, Seville JK, Ierapetritou MG, Muzzio FJ. 2010. Investigation of the effect of impeller rotation rate, powder flow rate, and cohesion on powder flow behavior in a continuous blender using PEPT. Chem Eng Sci. 65:5658–5668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Process Systems Enterprise Limited, 2015. gSOLIDS 4.1 Workflow for Data Processing and Parameter Estimation.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Rojo S, Lopez-Vadezate N, Cocero MJ. 2008. Residence time distribution studies of high pressure fluidized bed of microparticles. J Supercrit Fluids. 44:433–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers A, Ierapetritou MG. 2014. Discrete element reduced-order modeling of dynamic particulate systems. AIChE J. 60:3184–3194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilapuram V, Jaya Krishna D, Ozalp N. 2011. Residence time distribution and flow field study of aero-shielded solar cyclone reactor for emission-free generation of hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 36:13488–13500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanarase AU, Muzzio FJ. 2011. Effect of operating conditions and design parameters in a continuous powder mixer. Powder Technol. 208:26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikhansky A. 2008. Effect of diffusion on residence time distribution in chaotic channel flow. Chem Eng Sci. 63:1866–1870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waje SS, Patel AK, Thorat BN, Mujumdar AS. 2007. Study of residence time distribution in a pilot-scale screw conveyor dryer. Dry Technol An Int J. 25:249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Huang Z, Liao Z, Wang J, Yang Y, Wang Y. 2014. CFD simulations and experimental validation of macromixing and flow characteristic in LDPE autoclave reactors. Ind Eng Chem Res. 53:14865–14875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler GR, Aguilar CA. 2003. Residence time distribution in a co-rotating, twin-screw continuous mixer by the step change method. J Food Eng. 59:161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar