942
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Undergraduate learning in the field: Designing experiences, assessing outcomes, and exploring future opportunities

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 387-400 | Received 18 Jul 2019, Accepted 03 Jun 2020, Published online: 29 Jun 2020
 

Abstract

Field learning experiences reach tens of thousands of undergraduate students annually, constituting their importance as components of undergraduate education and potential pathways for STEM education. Reports and planning efforts by national entities have highlighted the need to ground undergraduate field learning experiences in evidence-based practices, and to better understand the impacts of these experiences on students. In this study we describe the results of a national survey aimed at better understanding how instructors and directors at biological field stations, marine laboratories, and geoscience field camps are thinking about and designing programs, including learning strategies, student support, desired student outcomes, student assessment and program evaluation. This study is based on an online survey distributed in 2018 to a sample of directors and educators representing 163 undergraduate field learning experiences. The study achieved a satisfactory response rate of 31% (n = 563). The results of the study provide guidance on where support for improvement and research efforts should focus, including more intentional program design that considers student-centered and inclusive approaches and basic research on the impact of undergraduate field learning experiences on student learning more broadly (not just investigated in one program or course), both in terms of what the students learn (broadly defined) as well as how they learn, taking into account affective and cognitive gains. Such research can make productive use of the diversity of program types to investigate the link between student outcomes and student experiences.

Acknowledgments

We are sincerely grateful to Ian Billick for his help developing the survey and for his thoughtful review of this article. Thank you to Jan Hodder and Aude Lochet for pilot-testing the survey for this study and to Lissy Goralnik, Teresa Mourad, Paulinus Chigbu, and Ben Cuker for help developing survey items. We appreciate thoughtful conversation with Michael Giamellaro, and Alison Jolley about the concept of immersive experiences. We are grateful to Jessica Sawyer who improved the readability of the article through her detailed copy-editing and cleaning up of references. We thank several anonymous reviewers who gave us thoughtful suggestions for improving this article. Lastly, we are most grateful for all the busy program directors, instructors, and coordinators who took time to share their thoughts in the survey that formed a basis for this article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under RCN-UBE grant #1730756 to K. O’Connell, A. Berkowitz, I. Billick, G. Bowser, and J. Branchaw.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 102.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.