Nutraceutical potential of the pulp of five cultivars of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] grown in Burkina Faso

ABSTRACT

Watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] is a cucurbit with high value in Burkina Faso. It is appreciated for its fruits, which are widely consumed. In the literature, watermelon is described as an important source of bioactive compounds beneficial to health. There is very little scientific data on this supposed nutraceutical potential of the watermelon. This study aimed to characterize the nutraceutical and antioxidant potential of the pulp of five watermelon cultivars grown in Burkina Faso to identify the best cultivars for consumers. The study focused on the physicochemical, nutraceutical, and antioxidant activity characterization of the cultivars using standard methods. This study revealed a significant variation in total phenolics, flavonoids, β-carotene, and lycopene contents between the five cultivars while the color did not show significant variation. The color parameters with ΔE ranging from 40.62 ± 4.87 (SB cultivar) to 48.90 ± 15.81 (KK cultivar) determined did not reveal any significant difference between cultivars. For the phytochemical parameters: total phenolic compounds, total flavonoids, β-carotene, and lycopene, the cultivars KK and KA showed the highest content. The statistical analysis of the results shows positive correlations between phytochemical composition and pulp color. The color could thus, depending on the cultivar and its maturity, constitute a preliminary indicator of choice for the estimation of the content of bioactive compounds.

KEYWORDS:

• Citrullus lanatus
• Phenolic compounds
• lycopene
• Antioxidant activity

Introduction

Plant products have always been used to meet the basic needs of humans including food and medicine. Indeed, plants are the primary source of nutritional and bioactive compounds capable of preventing diseases.^[1] These bioactive compounds such as phenolics have shown anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, and anti-obesity properties.^[2] Among these plants, fruits and vegetables are known to be important sources of bioactive compounds and thus abound in functional properties, useful in the fight against diseases.^[3,4] Watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] belongs to this category of plants and is of both therapeutic and nutritional interest. Citrullus lanatus is an annual herbaceous in the Cucurbitaceae plants family and native to Africa.^[5] It is cultivated worldwide and in most sub-Saharan African countries including Burkina Faso for its edible fleshy pulp fruits.^[6] Its production has been booming in recent years and is now increasingly important among cash crops. Watermelon production and marketing are a growing business at the national level and are accessible to all socio-economic.^[7] Reports indicate that watermelon is rich in phenolic compounds and antioxidants (polyphenols, flavonoids, lycopene, citrulline …) that have a positive effect on health by reducing the risk of cardiovascular, chronic, and neurodegenerative diseases.^[4,8] Moreover, its low energy value and low-fat content make it a recommended food for overweight and hypertensive people.^[3,9]

Because of its nutritional profile, watermelon could contribute to the fight against malnutrition by improving the diet of households and against diseases caused by oxidative stress.^[4,8] This fruit could therefore constitute a serious alternative to reduce the prevalence of malnutrition (23% of the population), particularly linked to the scarcity of fruit in the diet.^[10,11] However, research work indicates that the biochemical profile of plants can be influenced by genetic factors, maturity, and ecology.^[12] Unfortunately, there is no study on the phytochemical and antioxidant profile of watermelon cultivars in Burkina Faso. This study aimed to document the nutraceutical potential of five watermelon cultivars grown in Burkina Faso. This literature can contribute to the food and pharmaceutical valorization of watermelon, to the conservation of the best genetic heritage, and especially to the achievement of food security which remains a priority in developing countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.

Materials and methods

Plant material

The plant materials consisted of fruits of five watermelon cultivars collected from producers and retailers in four regions of Burkina. The sampling was done from September to December 2020. The cultivars selected are listed in Table 1. Only the pulp taken from the heart of the ripe fruit was used for this study. Part of the samples was dried in an electric dryer (Dreyer 1100 VISMARA) for 2 weeks at 37°C and the other part was frozen at −20°C until use.

Table 1. Watermelon cultivars selected for this study.

Code	Cultivars names	Fruit characteristics *	n	Cultivars pictures **
KK	Kaolack	Fruit shape: spherical Color: light green with fine stripes	12
KA	Kasmira	Fruit shape: spherical to elongated; Color: light green with clear green stripes	12
LG	Charleston gray	Fruit shape: elongated Color: white with fine stripes not very visible	12
SB	Sugar baby	Fruit shape: spherical Color: dark green to dark	12
CS	Crimson Sweet	Fruit shape: spherical Color: dark green with large light-green stripes	12

Legend: * description made in the laboratory; ** Source: BAZIE, 2020.

Determination of pulp color

The color of the fruit pulp was determined by the colorimetry method.^[13] Cubic slices of pulp (4 × 4 × 4 cm thick) taken from the center of three fruits of each sample were placed on white paper and then flashed with a colorimeter (PCE-CMS 1). The parameters L*, a*, b*,ΔE, C, and H were determined according to the “CIE-LAB” colorimetric system.

pH and Titratable acid determination

The determination of pH of watermelon juice has been made by using a digital glass electrode pH meter, PHS-25 w.^[14] Juice extraction was done by pressing.^[15] The titratable acidity was determined by an acid-base assay with a 0.1 N sodium hydroxide solution, in the presence of phenolphthalein as a colored indicator according to the AOAC methods.^[16]

Determination of Phenolic Compounds Content

The extraction of phenolic compounds consisted in dispersing 500 mg of the dry ground pulp of each sample in 15 mL of 80% (v/v) methanol under continual agitation at 200 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 4 hours at 25°C. After centrifugation at 4000 rpm. The collected supernatant constituted the crude extract that was used for analyses. The determination of total phenolic content (TPC) was performed by the method of using Folin & Ciocalteu’s reagent with slight modification.^[17] The TPC was expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE) per 100 mg of dry matter (DM). Determination of total flavonoid content was performed according to the colorimetric method with aluminum trichloride (AlCl₃) of Dowd adapted.^[18] Results were expressed as mg quercetin equivalent (mg QE) per 100 mg of dry matter (DM).

Determination of Tannins Content

The determination of hydrolyzable tannins content was performed according to the ferric trichloride (FeCl₃) method.^[19] Each extract (5 mg/mL) was treated with a solution of ferric trichloride (FeCl₃) in hydrochloric acid (HCl) and the absorbance of the mixture was read after 15s at 660 nm. Hydrolyzable tannins contents were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent per g dry extract (mg GAE/g DM).

Determination of condensed tannins was performed by the acidified vanillin method with slight modification.^[20] Each extract (5 mg/mL) was treated with a 1% vanillin solution in 70% sulfuric acid. The absorbance of the mixture was read at 500 nm after 15 min of incubation in a water bath at 20°C in the dark. Condensed tannins content was calculated and expressed as mg catechin equivalent per g dry extract (mg Cat. E/g DM) according to the formula (1):

(1) $\mathit{TC}\left(\mathrm{\%}\right)=\left(5.2\mathrm{x}{10}^{-2}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{A}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{V}\right)/\mathrm{P}$(1)

where TC: condensed tannins; 5.2 x 10⁻²: constant expressed in Catechin equivalent; A: absorbance; V: volume of extract used; P: weight of samples.

Determination of Anthocyanins

Total Anthocyanin Pigment content (APC) was performed by the pH differential method.^[21] The anthocyanin pigment concentration was calculated and expressed as cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents (CE), as follows (2):

(2) $\mathbf{APC}=\frac{\mathbf{A}\times \mathbf{MW}\times \mathbf{DF}\times {\mathbf{10}}^{\mathbf{3}}}{\mathit{\epsilon }\times \mathbf{l}}$(2)

Where APC = Anthocyanin pigment (CE mg/L); A = (A520 nm – A700 nm) pH 1.0 – (A520 nm – A700 nm) pH 4.5; MW (molecular weight) = 449.2 g/mol for cyanidin-3-glucoside (cyd-3-glu); DF = dilution factor established in D; l = pathlength in cm; ε = 26,900 molar extinction coefficients, in L*mol ^{– 1} * cm ^{– 1}, for cyd-3-glu, and 10³ = factor for conversion from g to mg.

Determination of β-Carotene and Lycopene Content

Determination of β-carotene and lycopene content was performed with the spectrometric method.^[22] For this purpose, the samples were extracted with the acetone-water mixture (70:30 v/v). Then the absorbance of the supernatant was measured with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (HELIOS EPSILON, THERMO Scientific) at 453; 505; 645 and 663 nm. The contents of beta carotene and lycopene expressed respectively in mg of β-carotene/g and mg of Lycopene/g of dry materials and were determined according to the equations (3(3) $\mathit{\beta }-\mathit{carotene}\mathit{content}=0.216\times A_{663}-1.22\times A_{645}-0.304\times A_{505}+0.452\times A_{453}$(3) ;4):

(3) $\mathit{\beta }-\mathit{carotene}\mathit{content}=0.216\times A_{663}-1.22\times A_{645}-0.304\times A_{505}+0.452\times A_{453}$(3)

(4) $\mathit{Lycopeneb}\mathit{content}=-0.0458\times A_{663}+0.204\times A_{645}+0.372\times A_{505}-0.0806\times A_{453}$(4)

Where: A = absorbance of the sample measured.

Evaluation of antioxidant activity

Evaluation of antioxidant activity by the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) test: The evaluation of antioxidant activity by the iron reduction method is based on the reduction of ferric ions (Fe³⁺) to ferrous ions (Fe²⁺) by reducing compounds (antioxidants), which is accompanied by the appearance of an intense blue coloration measurable at 700 nm.^[23] The concentration of reducing compounds (antioxidants) in the extract is expressed in mg ascorbic acid equivalent (AAE) per 100 mg of dry matter.

Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity by the ABTS Test: The evaluation of the antiradical activity by ABTS assay is based on the discoloration of the stable radical cation ABTS^.+ [2.2’-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)] to ABTS, in the presence of antiradical compounds.^[24] The chromophore radical cation ABTS^.+ involved, with a blue-green color is followed has its λ_max at 734 nm in a spectrophotometer (Epoch; BioTeK). The content of compounds with a reducing effect on the radical cation ABTS^.+ (antiradical compounds) is expressed in mmol Ascorbic Acid Equivalent per 100 mg dry matter (mM AAE/100 mg DM).

Evaluation of the Antioxidant Activity by the DPPH Reduction Test: Evaluation of antioxidant activity was performed by 2.2-diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging method.^[25] When the stable DPPH free radical (dark purple hue) reacts with an antiradical, it produces discoloration of the solution, a reduction in absorbance measurable at 517 nm with a spectrophotometer (Epoch; BioTeK). The antioxidant activity of the samples was expressed as a percentage of inhibition (% inh) according to the formula (5):

(5) $\mathbf{\%}\mathbf{Inh}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{Abs}\left(\mathbf{blanc}\right)\mathbf{-}\mathbf{Abs}\left(\mathbf{sample}\right)}{\mathbf{Abs}\left(\mathbf{blanc}\right)}$(5)

Where % Inh = antiradical activity in the percentage of inhibition; Abs (blank) = Absorbance of the blank; Abs (sample) = Absorbance of the sample.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of the data was performed using XLSTAT software (Addinsoft, 2021). It consisted of the analysis of variances (ANOVA) by Tukey’s test at the 5% threshold for the comparison of means and principal component analysis (PCA). The results were expressed as mean ± standard error (SD) of the mean.

Results and discussion

Results

The color of the pulp ranges from orange-red to red. Only the L*and b* parameters of the color show a significant difference according to the cultivar and the harvest area. The other parameters a*, ΔE, H, and C didn’t show significant differences depending on the cultivar (Figure 1). All cultivars show positive values for the color parameters (L*, a*, b > 0). Even so, the cultivar KK presents strong values, whether for the ΔE, L*, b* and C* translating a more vivid color.

Figure 1. Averages of pulp color parameters of the five watermelon cultivars studied. (a): mean of total color, E; (b): mean of brightness, L*; (c): mean of b*; (d): mean of a*.

The total titratable acidity (TTA) and pH of watermelon juice samples range from 4.92 to 5.58 mg CAE/100 mL of juice and 4.90 to 5.18 respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2. pH and titratable acidity of the watermelon cultivars juice.

The total phenolic content ranged from 0.39 ± 0.12 (SB) to 0.74 ± 0.32 mg GAE/100 mg DM (KK) with a significant difference depending on the cultivar and the harvest area. As for total flavonoids, the levels varied from 0.27 ± 0.09 (LG) to 0.36 ± 0.17 mg TE/100 mg DM (KA). The variations observed were not significant according to cultivars (Figure 3, 4).

Figure 3. Average of total phenolic contents of the cultivars studied.

Figure 4. Average of total flavonoids contents of the studied cultivars.

The hydrolyzable tannins content ranges from 1.46 ± 0.10 (LG) to 1.64 ± 0.19 mg GAE/g DM. The condensed tannins content also ranges from 0.64 ± 0.30 to 0.90 ± 0.76 Cat. E/g DM (Figure 5). The variation of hydrolyzable tannins content shows singulative difference according to the cultivars but it was not the same for condensed tannins which don’t show singulative difference according to the cultivars.

Figure 5. Tannins contents of the cultivars studied.

The anthocyanidin content of the cultivars ranges from 15.93 (LG) to 54.16 mg CE/g DM (CS). This variation was significantly dependent on the cultivar. CS and KK Cultivars show the highest anthocyanidin content (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Average total anthocyanidin contents of the cultivars studied.

The contents of carotenoids, β-carotene and lycopene varied respectively from 0.083 ± 0.03 (CS) to 0.104 ± 0.01 mg/100 mg DM (KK) and from 0.049 ± 0.00 (LG) to 0.058 ± 0.00 mg/100 mg DM (KA). These assay levels were significantly different (p = .00; F = 16.30 and p = .00; F = 22.99) depending on the cultivar and harvest area. KK and KA cultivars showed the highest β-carotene and lycopene contents (figure 7, 8).

Figure 7. Average lycopene content of the studied watermelon cultivars.

Figure 8. Average β-carotene content of the studied watermelon cultivars.

The antioxidant activities evaluated by DPPH and ABTS methods are summarized in Table 2. According to the ABTS method, the cultivar KK showed the highest activity (61.54 ± 14.32 mmol AAE/g DM). The antioxidant activity according to the ABTS method is positively correlated with their total phenolic and carotenoid content. According to the DPPH method, the highest percentage of inhibition (89.60% ± 1.91%) at a 1 mg/mL sample concentration was observed with the LG cultivar. KK and LG cultivars showed the highest activities by both methods (Table 2).

Table 2. Antioxidant activity of watermelon cultivars studied.

Cultivars	DPPH (inh. %)	ABTS (mM AAE/g DM)	FRAP (mM AAE/g DM)
CS	86.10±4.00^a	44.97±22.61^ab	30.88±6.91^a
KA	88.58±1.43^a	59.91±29.97^b	29.14±6.09^a
KK	88.01±2.59^a	43.34±5.34^ab	35.25±8.04^a
LG	89.60±1.91^a	39.49±20.09^ab	33.74±14.68^a
SB	88.55±1.03^a	25.49±12.03^a	35.54±10.18^a
Pr> F	0.345	0.0000	0.412
Significant	No	Yes	No

NB: Means in each column sharing no letters in common are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Statistical analysis revealed correlations between the different parameters studied. The Pearson correlation matrix of the different variables studied showed positive relationships between the different variables in the study (Table 3). Thus, a positive correlation between the color parameters (a* and H) and the secondary metabolite contents were observed. It should also be noted that the content of phenolic compounds and carotenoids and antioxidant activity (ABTS) are positively correlated. Principal component analysis was used to graphically illustrate the correlations between the variables and the proximity of the cultivars (Figure 9). It revealed, indeed, proximity between the cultivars LG, CS, and SB. The axis F1 (carrying 41.51% of the information) carries the variables TPC, Flavonoids β-carotene, and Lycopene to the variables ΔE, L* and b*. It should be noted that the different phenolic and carotenoid contents are also positively related to the L*, b* of the pulp as well as the chromaticity, and C of the color.

Table 3. Correlation matrix (Pearson).

	ΔE	L*	a*	b*	C	H	TPC	Flavonoids	β-carotene	lycopene	Anthocyanin	H. tannin	C tannin	DPPH	ABTS	FRAP	PH	TTA
ΔE	1,00
L*	0.90	1.00
a*	−0.48	−0.52	1.00
b*	0.77	0.83	−0.23	1.00
C	0.68	0.70	−0.03	0.85	1.00
H	−0.65	−0.58	0.80	−0.35	−0.36	1.00
TPC	−0.02	−0.19	0.16	0.02	−0.05	0.23	1.00
Flavonoids	−0.13	−0.01	0.16	0.02	−0.12	0.43	0.19	1.00
β-carotene	−0.32	−0.31	0.22	0.07	0.00	0.36	0.45	0.52	1.00
Lycopene	−0.29	−0.20	0.12	0.03	−0.11	0.44	0.42	0.54	0.78	1.00
Anthocyanin	−0.21	−0.08	−0.18	−0.13	−0.21	−0.19	0.10	0.03	0.15	0.20	1.00
H. Tannin	−0.42	−0.28	0.14	−0.22	−0.24	0.37	0.02	0.37	0.37	0.43	0.19	1.00
C. Tannin	−0.14	−0.09	0.10	0.01	0.21	0.06	−0.01	0.43	0.32	0.20	0.00	0.55	1.00
DPPH	−0.39	−0.39	0.24	−0.31	−0.09	0.16	−0.14	−0.16	0.09	−0.02	−0.23	0.11	0.05	1.00
ABTS	−0.07	−0.09	−0.19	−0.22	−0.18	−0.25	−0.15	−0.17	−0.11	−0.11	0.41	0.09	−0.25	0.02	1.00
FRAP	−0.20	−0.22	0.42	0.07	0.15	0.27	0.14	0.19	0.29	0.05	−0.26	−0.04	0.26	0.17	−0.47	1.00
PH	−0.13	−0.12	0.29	0.02	−0.03	0.38	0.09	0.19	0.40	0.48	−0.07	0.00	−0.18	−0.10	0.23	−0.18	1.00
TTA	−0.04	0.07	0.38	0.27	0.32	0.39	0.12	0.27	0.27	0.28	−0.17	0.10	0.14	0.35	−0.24	0.34	0.29	1.00

Figure 9. Parameters and samples principal component analysis.

Discussion

The color parameters analysis of the five cultivars studied shows that the L* and b* parameters were significantly different according to the cultivar. Therefore, the pulp color alone would not be sufficient to differentiate the cultivars. This difficulty could be explained by the fact that the color of the pulp depends on several factors, in particular the degree of maturity of the fruit. Indeed, the color of the fruit varies greatly due to the accumulation of pigments in the fruit during ripening.^[26,27] However, the color of the pulp is an important sensory parameter for consumers. Indeed, along with fruit size and sugar content, it is the main trait underlying consumers’ choice.^[28] Studies on sensory traits have revealed that bright red color, consistency, and taste are the main attributes determining consumer acceptance of the product.^[29] The statistical analysis reveals positive correlations noted between the parameters (a and H*) of color and the contents of β-carotene and lycopene. There is also a negative correlation between L* and lycopene content as reported.^[30] Indeed, according to the literature, the red color of watermelon pulp is mainly related to its carotenoid composition, especially lycopene.^[31]

The titratable acidity and the pH are some parameters with show the different organic acid content of watermelon samples. The study didn’t reveal a significant difference between the five cultivars for the pH and titratable acidity parameters. However, by comparison with other studies, the results show that the different cultivars studied are low acidity and hydronium potential.^[32] This trait is interesting for a kind of consumption that would not appreciate too acidic fruits.

The pH and the Total titratable acidity of Citrullus lanatus cultivars fruits samples recorded were generally low on account of their pH which was slightly acidic. But these results were slightly higher than the pH of the pulp (5.07 ± 0.08) recorded previously.^[9] The pH and the TTA are some important parameters that custom the quality of fruit. Furthermore, titratable acidity and pH are parameters linked to physiological processes, in particular fruit ripening. They can be made up of indicators of the state of maturation of the fruit.^[33] The effects of pH and on the stability of polyphenols and antioxidant activity of extracts was shown.^[34,35]

The total phenolic contents observed varied significantly depending on the cultivar but are comparable to those reported in the literature 16.30–19.30 mg GAE/g of watermelon extracts.^[36] They were quite interesting for all cultivars in this study (3.9 ± 1.2 to 7.4 ± 3.2 mg GAE/g DM) with the cultivar KK in pole position. These levels of phenolic compounds make watermelon an important dietary source of phenolic compounds. Indeed, the high content of phenolic compounds could constitute an interesting therapeutic potential due to their contribution to biological activities.^[37,38] This composition is even more interesting when watermelon is commonly consumed raw. The flavonoid content also varied depending on the cultivar. The studied cultivars showed total flavonoid contents comparable to those (3.51–7.76 mg QE/g) reported previously.^[39] The cultivars KK and KA with the highest contents can be recommended to consumers. The high levels of phenolic compounds could be a nutritional advantage, as these compounds are the source of watermelon’s biological properties. It has been shown, for example, that constituents such as flavonoids, tannins, and polyphenols are responsible for the laxative activity of Citrullus lanatus. Indeed, work conducted on rats showed that aqueous extracts of watermelon pulp had significant laxative and antiulcerogenic activity.^[38,40]

In addition, the five watermelon cultivars studied showed quite interesting carotenoid contents. Indeed, β-carotene contents are similar to those found in previous studies (10.8 ± 1.6 g/g) on watermelon.^[27] Indeed, lycopene levels found in this study ranged from 30 mg/kg to 120 mg/kg of fresh materials (FM) as reported by others authors.^[41] These fairly high lycopene levels corroborate with the literature that cites watermelon as an important source of lycopene.^[38] It is worth noting a positive correlation (0.78) between β-carotene and lycopene contents which could be explained by the lycopene bioaccumulation process. Indeed, lycopene accumulation is related to the low expression of a transcription factor, an enzyme (lycopene β-cyclase) that converts lycopene to β-carotene.^[26]

The cultivars show low tannins content compared to the tannins level on the leaf.^[42] But, even though the tannins are known as antinutritional compounds, some studies showed that they are a lot of biological activities that improve the defense against bacterial infections.^[43] These phytochemicals especially flavonoids and tannins have been reported to have anti-diarrhea properties.^[44] The survey shows that the cultivar contains a meaningful quantity of anthocyanins. These pigments contribute to the activity of the antioxidant of the watermelon also.^[45] For the parameters commented above, the cultivar KK showed the most interesting values.

Watermelon is known for its positive effect on human health, i.e., previous studies have shown that consumption of watermelon increases blood levels of lycopene and β-carotene.^[46] These pigment molecules are cited as powerful antioxidants with a protective effect against oxidative stress and are beneficial for human health.^[46,47]

Regarding antiradical activity, Citrullus lanatus cultivars showed inhibition percentages (DPPH) ranging from 83.07 ± 0.04% to 91.64 ± 0.02% of 1 mg/mL concentrations. These activities are higher than the DPPH inhibition percentages of 68.24 ± 1.27% at 10 mg/mL concentrations previously reported by authors.^[36] According to the ABTS method, the studied cultivars also showed interesting antiradical activities. This antioxidant activity is the source of their biological activities beneficial to health. The antiradical properties of the studied cultivars could be explained by their biochemical composition, in particular their composition in secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds and carotenoids (lycopene particularly). The contribution of watermelon in antioxidant compounds is an interesting track, because of its thirst-quenching power and it can be consumed during intensive physical activities that accompany muscle stress.

The correlation analysis between the different parameters reveals the existence of positive links between the different secondary metabolites. This would mean that the metabolite contents are positively correlated and can therefore be selected simultaneously. There is also a positive relationship between these secondary metabolites and the ΔE of the pulp. Thus, ΔE could be considered to a lesser extent as a criterion for the selection of cultivars with a high content of phenolic compounds and carotenoids. This correlation is further explained by the contribution of pigmentary secondary metabolites such as carotenoids, especially lycopene has the red color of the fruit.^[48]

Conclusion

The examined watermelon cultivars show significant variability in terms of their phytochemical composition. Pulp color parameters vary considerably within cultivars depending on several factors. Nevertheless, it is an essential sensory characteristic to consider. There is a positive relationship between the pulp color parameters (ΔE, L*, b*and C*) and its phenolics and carotenoids content. The phenolic compounds and carotenoids content, especially lycopene, can explain the biological properties of the cultivars. The results obtained, the phytochemical composition, and the antioxidant activity, show that watermelon pulp, in addition to its nutritional role, has an interesting therapeutic potential. Among the studied cultivars, the KK cultivar presented the most interesting nutraceutical potential. Given these results, watermelon pulp could be recommended as a food supplement, especially for the control and prevention of chronic diseases. The results of this study could help vulgarize the positive effect, both nutritional and therapeutic, of the consumption of watermelon pulp on human health.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the West African Biotechnology Network (RABIOTECH, ISP/IPICS project n°172600000) which financed the mobilities for the collection of samples, purchase of chemical, and the acquisition of lab equipment’s.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.