Abstract
In this article, we present the results from a meta-analysis conducted over 44 experimental and field studies, which report individual discount rate estimates. We find in our research that the experimental design of a study has a decisive impact on these estimates, and conclude that meta-analysis, in the case of individual discount rates, has a low transfer value.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank participants in ‘Timescapes and Retroscapes’ (Palermo) and ERSA (Volos) conferences for useful comments on earlier drafts of this article.
Notes
1 For the use of meta-analysis in economics, see, amongst others, Florax et al. (Citation2002) and Nijkamp (Citation2005).
2 Notice that most of the studies present several discount rate estimates. The complete list of articles used in this article can be obtained from the authors upon request.
3Florax et al. (Citation2002) provide an excellent review of statistical procedures to test for publication bias.
4 The source for these variables is the World Development Indicators, a data set maintained and distributed by the World Bank. GDP is expressed as thousands of dollars in 1995 Purchasing Power Parity.
5 Recall that meta-analysis was developed in the context of medical science to facilitate the anamnesis when there is limited information on a patient's condition.