84
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correction

Correction

This article refers to:
Verbal instructions as selection bias that modulates visual selection

Article title: Verbal Instructions as Selection Bias that Modulates Visual Selectiona

Authors: Yevhen Damanskyy

Journal: Visual Cognition

Bibliometrics: Volume 31, Number 3, pages 169–187

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2023.2221046

When the article has been published, there are data and values indicated incorrectly. Below is the brief explanation and corrected information:

  1. The value of participants’ incorrect keypresses slightly deviates from the correct value.

  2. Correct values of b and p slightly deviate from the correct values.

  3. Numbers of SD, χ2, and p slightly deviate from the correct values.

  4. This sentence is missing the word ‘marginal’.

  5. The p-value slightly deviates from the correct one.

  6. A minus should be placed in front of 0.01.

  7. The link does not work. Although no correction is required, the link contains incorrect ‘spaces’ before and after the ‘=’ sign.

Page 173:

Data Preparation

1)

Other participants’ incorrect keypresses were also excluded (4.56% data lost).”

Page 175:

2)

In the incompatible group, participants’ responses were significantly more accurate in critical trials than in control trials (b = 0.49, 95% CI [0.06, 0.94], p = .027).

3)

Random Factors. The effect of response errors as a function of prime and compatibility varied in intercepts across participants (SD = 0.38, χ2(1) = 4.9, p= .026).

4)

In contrast, a between-subject comparison revealed a marginal significant difference between the critical trials in the compatible and incompatible groups (b = 0.04, 95% CI [−0.00, 0.10], p = .073),

Page 178:

5)

The overall two-way interaction between prime and compatibility was marginally significant (b = −0.37, 95%CI [−0.83, 0.06], p = .091)

6)

In the incompatible group, the responses in the critical and control trials were not significantly different (b = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.12, 0.01], p = .123).

Page 182

Availability of data and material:

7)

The datasets generated during the current study are available via the Open Science Framework (OSF): https://osf.io/4w6k9/?view_only=b8b2208fd93b4d2299eeaefc60238929

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.