Publication Cover
Performance Research
A Journal of the Performing Arts
Volume 21, 2016 - Issue 3: On Dialectics
1,040
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Brecht’s Gale

Innovation and Postdramatic Theatre

Pages 16-26 | Published online: 09 Jun 2016
 

Abstract

What can Marxist dialectics tell us about theatrical innovation? ‘Innovation’ saturates the world of contemporary performance, even though what the term actually means is anything but self-evident. This essay contrasts two ways scholars theorise theatrical innovation, one which owes to the work of the economist Joseph Schumpeter and the other to Bertolt Brecht. Whereas Schumpeter thought of innovation in terms of a “gale of creative destruction” that renovates capitalist society and its institutions, Brecht’s theory of innovation–what I call “Brecht’s gale”–described the measures artists must take to transform theatre into a weapon of anti-capitalist struggle.

For theatre scholars and artists, distinguishing between Schumpeter’s gale and Brecht’s gale can throw into relief the aspirations we pin on theatrical innovation. To demonstrate this I turn to ongoing debates around the politics of postdramatic theatre, and take the 2015 production of Simon Stephen’s Carmen Disruption at London’s Almeida Theatre as a case study. For some, the formal innovations that define postdramatic theatre separate it aesthetically and politically from dramatic theatre in radical ways. Yet celebrations of postdramatic theatre’s political function draw attention away from its social function. To date, theories of postdramatic theatre tell us little about the role postdramatic theatre plays in capitalist society. Instead scholars posit postdramatic theatre as the creative destruction of dramatic form, out of which theatre is renovated to suit the shifting demands of capitalist society. By drawing on Brecht as well as Marxian value-form theorists like Chris Arthur and Michael Heinrich, I offer a Marxist critique of postdramatic theatre, one that insists on the role aesthetic and political innovation play in capitalist reproduction.

Notes

1 Brecht issued this declaration on at least two occasions: in a 1930 essay co-authored with Peter Suhrkamp (Brecht Citation2015a: 70), and, later, in a 1932 speech (Brecht Citation2000a: 45).

2 See The New York Innovative Theatre Awards: http://www.nyitawards.com/aboutus

3 Two of the most frequently cited theorists of post-politics in the discourse on postdramatic theatre are Jacques Rancière (Citation1999) and Chantal Mouffe (Citation2005).

4 Brecht reiterated this perspective on the proletarianization of artists in several essays of the early 1930s (see 2015b, 2000b).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 244.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.