1,475
Views
74
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Outcomes of Quality Assurance: A Discussion of Knowledge, Methodology and Validity

Pages 3-13 | Published online: 12 May 2008
 

Abstract

A common characteristic in many quality assurance schemes around the world is their implicit and often narrowly formulated understanding of how organisational change is to take place as a result of the process. By identifying some of the underlying assumptions related to organisational change in current quality assurance schemes, the aim of this paper is to discuss the relevance of these assumptions in the light of more recent insights from organisational theory. It is argued that the whole field of quality assurance will benefit from the creation of a more realistic picture of how organisational change takes place in that this may provide (1) a more nuanced view on expected outcomes of quality assurance and (2) more refined quality assurance schemes.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Lee Harvey and Tine Sophie Pr⊘itz for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this article.

Notes

[1] This section builds upon and expands documentation taken from the article ‘Impact of quality processes’ in Bollaert et al. (Citation2007).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 480.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.