Abstract
Whereas most previous studies have assessed optimism/pessimism as a unidimensional construct, there is increasing awareness that optimism and pessimism may represent two partially independent dimensions. In this study, the role of optimism and pessimism for the maintenance of psychological well-being was assessed in 161 newly diagnosed cancer patients. Before the start of chemotherapy, more positive affect balance was associated with higher optimism and lower pessimism. Over the course of 9 months following diagnosis, pessimism predicted negative change in affect balance, whereas no effect of optimism appeared. Higher levels of perceived side-effects of chemotherapy were associated with negative change in affect balance. However, an interaction effect of perceived side-effects with pessimism indicated that this was only the case in patients with above-median levels of pessimism. The conclusion is drawn that it may be more important to be less pessimistic than to be optimistic when diagnosed with cancer.
Acknowledgement
The study was supported by research grant No. 70-2445-Hö3 from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe).
Notes
1. Differences between the results of the analysis of predictors of affect balance at T 1 and at T 2 could also have been influenced by the fact that only the latter analysis controlled for the perceived level of side-effects. We, therefore, omitted this variable and recomputed the regression analysis for affect balance at T 2. However similar to the results of , pessimism (B = −2.38, β = −.18, t = −2.46, p < .05) but not optimism (B = .27, β = .02, t = .25, n.s.) predicted change in affect balance, thus excluding this interpretation.