ABSTRACT
The historic Rideau Canal, spanning 200 km between the Canadian cities of Ottawa and Kingston, is a world heritage site and recreational waterway. The waterway presents a governance challenge, with multiple jurisdictions and agencies responsible for its management, making it difficult to establish a common vision to address environmental issues. Local stakeholders are concerned about toxic algal blooms in the downstream section of the Canal (the Lower Cataraqui region) because these blooms limit use of the system and pose a potential threat to human and environmental health. In the absence of a strategy to effectively manage water quality, a grassroots group called the Three Lakes Water Quality Group (TLG), has brought various stakeholders together to initiate transdisciplinary discussions and find solutions. This article presents findings from action research with the TLG. Specifically, it examines (1) the activities and concerns of the TLG in the governance arena, (2) the views of local stakeholders on social-ecological issues, (3) the potential of using collaborative systems thinking to capitalise on the TLG’s activities. Our analysis is informed by interviews and a workshop. We recommend that the TLG mobilise collaborative systems thinking when meeting with other stakeholders to discuss raising awareness, enforcing policy and producing knowledge about water quality issues in the region. These findings have implications for the entire Rideau Canal and other historic waterways by revealing the potential of local residents to initiate dialogue and drive future co-governance efforts.
Acknowledgements
We thank all workshop and interview participants.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
Data available within its supplementary materials found here: doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5123894.
Notes
1 In Ontario, Conservation Authorities “are community-based watershed management agencies, whose mandate is to undertake watershed-based programs to protect people and property from flooding, and other natural hazards, and to conserve natural resources for economic, social and environmental benefits.” (Conservation Ontario Citationn.d.)
3 Evans and Stevens were participants, and Kotecha was an observer.
4 Every participant in the workshop consented to having their names and occupations appear in publications. Nevertheless, we assign pseudonyms to participants while accurately reporting their occupation or group membership.