Exporting virtue: neoconservatism, democracy promotion and the end of history

Abstract

Changes in neoconservative foreign policy thought in the post-Cold War period have often been downplayed. Interested observers seem content to emphasise continuities or merely changes in personnel with a second generation of neoconservatives replacing an earlier cadre, rather than shifts in the ideology itself. By interrogating the early post-Cold War years, this article argues that neoconservatism as an ideology underwent significant changes, with a cautious form of realism, even isolationism, replaced by a much more expansive and ambitious worldview. Humanitarian interests and the promotion of democracy abroad assumed more central roles in neoconservative discourse in a way they had not hitherto achieved. These concerns when combined with the frequent advocacy of American hegemony shifted neoconservatism in a direction which was not anticipated in the immediate aftermath of the Cold War. The structural decline of bipolarity in the international system; the impact of democracy promotion discourses including Francis Fukuyama's ‘End of History’ thesis; and a religious ‘turn’ in neoconservative thought all contributed to this new direction, laying the ideological groundwork for many of the ideas which underpinned the 2003 Iraq War.

Keywords:

• neoconservatism
• democracy promotion
• Francis Fukuyama
• humanitarian interventionism

View correction statement:

Erratum

Notes

Fred Barnes, ‘Winners and Losers: A Postwar Balance Sheet’, The National Interest 24 (1991): 44, 46.

Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, ‘A Normal Country in a Normal Time’, in America's Purpose: New Visions of U.S. Foreign Policy, ed. Owen Harries (San Francisco: ICS Press, 1991), 161–3.

Irving Kristol, ‘Foreign Policy in an Age of Ideology’, The National Interest 1 (1985): 11.

Irving Kristol, ‘Defining Our National Interest’, in America's Purpose: New Visions of U.S. Foreign Policy, ed. Owen Harries (San Francisco: ICS Press, 1991), 63.

Eliot A. Cohen, ‘The Future of Force’, The National Interest 21 (1990): 8.

Lewis D. Solomon, Paul D. Wolfowitz: Visionary Intellectual, Policymaker, and Strategist (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2007), 69.

Paul Wolfowitz, ‘Victory Came Too Easily’, The National Interest 35 (1994): 87.

Daniel Pipes, ‘What Kind of Peace?’, The National Interest 23 (1991): 9.

Norman Podhoretz, ‘In Israel, with Scuds and Patriots’, Commentary 91, no. 4 (1991): 23.

John Judis, ‘On the Home Front: The Gulf War's Strangest Bedfellows: Will the Aipac/Bandar/Defense Industry Alliance Survive the Peace?’, The Washington Post, June 23, 1991.

John J. Mearsheimer, ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neo-Conservatism’, http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp (accessed February 8, 2009).

Maria Ryan, The Imperatives of Power: Neoconservatism, Unipolarism and the New American Century (Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2007).

Stefan A. Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 98–9.

Charles Krauthammer, ‘The Unipolar Moment’, Foreign Affairs 70, no. 1 (1991): 23–4.

Charles Krauthammer, ‘Universal Dominion’, in America's Purpose: New Visions of US Foreign Policy, ed. Owen Harries (San Francsico: ICS, 1991), 11–13.

Patrick E. Tyler, ‘U.S. Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop’, The New York Times, March 8, 1992.

William Kristol and Robert Kagan, ‘Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy’, Foreign Affairs 75, no. 4 (1996): 18–32.

Michael Ledeen, Tocqueville on American Character: Why Tocqueville's Brilliant Exploration of the American Spirit Us as Vital and Important Today as It Was Nearly Two Hundred Years Ago (New York: St. Martins, 2000).

Francis Fukuyama, After the Neocons: America at the Crossroads (London: Profile, 2006), 55.

Francis Fukuyama, ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest 16 (1989): 4.

Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press 1992), 145–50.

Ibid., 307.

Anne Norton, Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).

Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man, 329.

Michael C. Williams, ‘What Is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory’, European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 3 (2005): 317.

Gregory A. Fossedal, The Democratic Imperative: Exporting the American Revolution (New York: New Republic; Basic, 1989), 218.

Joshua Muravchik, Exporting Democracy: Fulfilling America's Destiny (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 1991), 8–9.

Ibid., 125–44.

Fossedal, The Democratic Imperative, 240.

Tony Smith, A Pact with the Devil: Washington's Bid for World Supremacy and the Betrayal of the American Promise (New York: Routledge, 2007), 74–5.

Tony Smith, ‘Wilsonianism after Iraq: The End of Liberal Internationalism?’, in The Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-First Century, ed. G. John Ikenberry et al. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009), 77.

Bill Clinton, My Life (New York: Knopf, 2004).

Williams, ‘What Is the National Interest?’, 309.

Gary J. Dorrien, Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana (New York: Routledge, 2004), 132.

Stuart Croft, ‘Christian Evangelicals and US Foreign Policy’, in New Directions in US Foreign Policy, ed. Inderjeet Parmar, Linda B. Miller and Mark Ledwidge (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009), 122.

Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1982).

Richard John Neuhaus, The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1984).

A.J. Bacevich, ‘Commentary Gets Religion’, The Weekly Standard, December 4, 1995, 34–5.

Elliott Abrams, ‘The National Prospect: A Symposium’, Commentary 100, no. 5 (1995): 24–5.

Richard Pipes, ‘The National Prospect: A Symposium’, Commentary 100, no. 5 (1995), 96–7.

Irving Kristol, ‘The National Prospect: A Symposium’, Commentary 100, no. 5 (1995), 73–4.

Eliot A. Cohen, ‘The Future of Force’, 43–4.

Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, 90–1.

William J. Bennett, Ibid., 29–30.

Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 231.

David Brooks, ‘Kicking the Secularist Habit: A Six-Step Program’, The Atlantic Monthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2003/03/brooks.htm (accessed 24 May 2010).

Elliott Abrams, Faith or Fear: How Jews Can Survive in a Christian America (New York: Free Press, 1997), 67, 84–5, 135.

Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution, 232.

Project for the New American Century, ‘Statement of Principles’, http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm (accessed 9 May 2010).

Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution, 219–20.

Croft, ‘Christian Evangelicals and US Foreign Policy’, 122–5.

Lee Marsden, For God's Sake: The Christian Right and US Foreign Policy (London: Zed Books, 2008), 89–112.

Robert Kagan and William Kristol, ‘Win It’, The Weekly Standard, 19 April 1999.

Lawrence F. Kaplan and William Kristol, The War Over Iraq: Saddam's Tyranny and America's Mission (San Francisco: Encounter, 2003), 3, 104.

Kristol and Kagan, ‘Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy’, 18–32.