Publication Cover
Teacher Development
An international journal of teachers' professional development
Volume 12, 2008 - Issue 3
135
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The dilemma of field experience assessment: enhancing professional development or fulfilling a gate‐keeping function?

&
Pages 223-236 | Received 12 Feb 2007, Accepted 08 May 2008, Published online: 18 Jul 2008
 

Abstract

The field experience component in a teacher education programme serves both a gate‐keeping function and a formative purpose that supports student teacher development. The authors were members of a research team which took care of the re‐design of the assessment instrument for the field experience component of a teacher education programme, as well as conducting a pilot implementation test. The new assessment instrument, referred to as a Professional Development Progress Map, was developed with reference to the professional standards formulated by an official teacher education policy advisory body. This paper looks into the comments of the users, that is the supervisors and the student teachers (or participants, as in‐service teachers were involved in the pilot implementation test) after the pilot implementation test. Findings suggest difficulties in using the Progress Map as a summative assessment instrument regarding the determination of grades and levels, making judgements based on observable performance and collection of evidence, and difficulty in assessing the domain ‘Involvement in Education Community’. The discussion highlights the dilemma related to the use of professional standards as summative assessment instruments, and how users may be re‐orientated to enhance the formative purpose. The paper concludes with suggestions on prudent use of the Progress Map.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Special Project Grant at the Hong Kong Institute of Education for supporting the study reported in this paper.

Notes

1. The two authors of this article were among the tertiary supervisors who participated in the trial use of the Progress Map in this study.

2. Relevant documents of the Progress Map were sent to those participants who did not attend the briefing session.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 399.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.