2,613
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Introducing the Psychological Wellbeing Scale for Muslim Societies (PWS-MS): a study among young adults in Pakistan

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 07 Jul 2022, Accepted 18 Oct 2022, Published online: 13 Jan 2023

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the psychometric properties of the short (18-item) form of the Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing, presented for online administration, among a sample of 370 young adults between the ages of 18 and 26 years who were born in Punjab and who had lived there since their birth, and tested the two hypotheses that the negatively-voiced items would detract from the unidimensionality of the scale and that, with the removal of the negatively-voiced items, the remaining 10 items would generate a unidimensional and reliable measure of psychological wellbeing embracing all six of the proposed components of wellbeing (self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth). The data supported both hypotheses, and commended the resulting 10-item Psychological Wellbeing Scale for Muslim Societies (PWS-MS).

Introduction

Classic wisdom within the field of psychometrics and the development of psychological tests has emphasised the importance of including a proportion of negatively-voiced items that require reverse coding to compute the scale score. The rationale for the inclusion of such items has rested on safeguarding against response setting (Anastasi, Citation1961; Edwards, Citation1970; Mehrens & Lehmann, Citation1983; Nunnally, Citation1978; Rossi et al., Citation1983). Within the general literature on psychometrics and the development of psychometric tests this classic wisdom has come under increasing scrutiny, and empirical evidence suggests that negatively-voiced items may detract from the unidimensionality and internal consistency of psychological measures (Barnette, Citation2000, Citation2001; Roszkowski & Soven, Citation2010; Suárez-Alvarez et al., Citation2018).

Questioning of the place of negatively-voiced items has been raised in the transference of instruments constructed in Western societies to application in predominantly Muslim societies, especially when these instruments are concerned with the evaluation of attitudes toward religion, or toward other people. For example, in respect of measures concerned with religion, the 23-item Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Islam (Sahin & Francis, Citation2002) contained six negatively-voiced items. These items were found to be problematic for the psychometric properties of the scale among Muslim students in Kuwait (Francis et al., Citation2006), Pakistan (Musharraf et al., Citation2014), and Malaysia (Francis et al., Citation2016). The seven-item Astley-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Theistic Faith (Astley et al., Citation2012) contained two negatively voiced items. These items were found to be problematic for the psychometric properties of the scale among Muslim students in the UK (Erken & Francis, Citation2021; Francis et al., Citation2013; Francis & Lewis, Citation2016). It is argued that endorsement of such items signals disrespect for Allah and perhaps even verge on blasphemy.

In respect of measures concerned with the evaluation of other people, the 55-item Parental Attitude Questionnaire (Kenny, Citation1987) contained 25 negatively-voiced items. These items were found to be problematic for the psychometric properties of the scale among Muslim students in Pakistan (Akhtar et al., Citationunder review). It is argued that endorsement of such items signals disrespect for parents.

What is not yet known is whether negatively-voiced items would also prove detrimental in predominantly Muslim societies to measure attitude toward an evaluation of self. The purpose of the present study is to address the gap in the literature by exploring among a sample of Muslim students in Pakistan the properties of the 18-item measure of psychological wellbeing proposed by Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995). This measure contains eight negatively-voiced items.

Introducing the Ryff measures of psychological wellbeing

The conceptualisation and measurement of psychological wellbeing has followed a variety of paths, rooted either in clear conceptualisation or in statistical patterning of data (for a recent overview see Oishi & Heintzelman, Citation2019). Within this broad field, three papers crystalise the formulation of the Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing. On a quest for a better understanding of successful aging in older adults, Ryff identified a number of problems in the body of research on wellbeing related to lack of theoretical frameworks on wellbeing, emphasis on absence of illness, inattention to the possibility of development and growth throughout the lifespan, and inattention to the variability in personal, cultural, and historical conceptions of wellbeing (Ryff, Citation1989a). Ryff’s synthesis of developmental, personal growth, and mental health theories resulted in six newly integrated criteria for successful aging: self-acceptance, positive relations, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth.

A second paper tested this theoretical formulation through structured interviews of middle and old aged men and women in Midwestern United States on their perceptions and experiences of positive functioning (Ryff, Citation1989b). Findings from this study supported the theory that there are differences between middle age and old age conceptions of wellbeing. In a third paper, Ryff (Citation1989c) operationalised her six factor model into a 120-item survey comprised of positively-voiced and negatively-voiced Likert items on perceived psychological wellbeing. When administered to a group of young, middle, and old aged men and women alongside previously used measurements, a correlation analysis confirmed the presence of several unique factors not represented in previous measurements, suggesting that the Ryff scale captures a more comprehensive dimension of wellbeing.

The Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing has undergone a plethora of mutations into 84, 54, 42, 38, 33, 30, 24, 22, 18, 15, and 12-item instruments (Cheng & Chan, Citation2005; Fernandes et al., Citation2010; Gao & McLellan, Citation2018; Manchirajhu, Citation2020; Morozink et al., Citation2010; Ryff et al., Citation1994; Ryff & Keyes, Citation1995; Springer & Hauser, Citation2006; Van Dierendonck, Citation2005; Villar et al., Citation2010; Zizek et al., Citation2015). Of these versions, the 18-item, 42-item, and 84-item scales seem to have accrued majority usage. Applied to more than just maturing adults in the USA, the Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing has since been tested on diverse ages and nationalities and translated into more than thirty-five languages, including Urdu, Chinese, and Dutch (Cheng & Chan, Citation2005; Hailegiorgi et al., Citation2018; Jibeen & Khalid, Citation2012; Mondi & Reynolds, Citation2022; Ryff, Citation2019; Van Dierendonck, Citation2005). In a systematic review, Ryff noted that the Scales of Psychological Wellbeing has been employed as a dependent, moderating, and antecedent variable within a variety of contexts such as psychological development and aging, personality, family experiences, work and other life engagements, health and biological research, and clinical and intervention studies (Ryff, Citation2014; Ryff & Singer, Citation1996). For example, Herzog and Strevey (Citation2008) found that contact with nature and sense of humour impact psychological wellbeing. In another study, Friedman and Ryff (Citation2012) found that psychological functioning predicts lower biological risk factors.

Assessing the Ryff measures

The number of different versions of the Ryff Scale of Psychological Wellbeing (containing 120, 84, 54, 42, 38, 33, 30, 24, 22, 18, 15, and 12 items), the range of different translations, and the diverse sociodemographics among participants make psychometric evaluation of the Ryff scales a difficult task (Shyrock & Meeks, Citation2018). Overall, the longer versions may be more reliable compared to the shorter versions, although some findings are mixed. The original 120-item scale tested on men and women in the USA indicated good internal consistency and test/retest reliability (Ryff, Citation1989b). A 54-item version tested on older Spanish adults showed weak internal consistency (Triadó et al., Citation2007). A study on Portuguese adolescents indicated satisfactory internal consistency for a 30-item version, but not for the 18-item version in the same sample (Fernandes et al., Citation2010). Weakened reliability in the 18-item version was also true for Chinese adolescents (Gao & McLellan, Citation2018). However, a study on Swedish white-collar workers produced opposite findings in the 18-item version (Lindfors et al., Citation2006). One systematic review found a higher mean alpha coefficient among the composite scales ranging between six and 86 items (mode = 18) compared to the subscales ranging between three and 20 items (mode = 14) (Crouch et al., Citation2017).

Although there has been considerable effort concentrated on testing the reliability of the different scales, a systematic review of factor analysis is still needed (Springer & Hauser, Citation2006). Overall, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the shorter scales may have more factorial validity than the longer scales. A few studies looking at both short and long versions confirmed the six factor model as best fit, albeit concerns about high latent variable correlations (Ryff & Keyes, Citation1995; Van Dierendonck, Citation2005). Many studies looking across the 12-item to 54-item scale range distilled the six original factors down to only three or four – these studies involved diverse participants including Slovenian employees, Spanish older adults, Chinese adolescents, and USA midlife adults (Gao & McLellan, Citation2018; Springer & Hauser, Citation2006; Triadó et al., Citation2007; Zizek et al., Citation2015). One study found as many as 15 factors in the 120-item version, and another found eight factors in the 42-item version (Kafka & Kozma, Citation2002; Manchirajhu, Citation2020). Finally, both longer and shorter versions revealed a number of unnamed and named latent variables among Spanish, Korean, and Australian participants (Burns & Machen, Citation2009; Seo et al., Citation2019; Villar et al., Citation2010).

Many studies have uncovered the effects of sociodemographics, such as gender, age, and culture, on the reliability and validity of the scales (Marks & Lambert, Citation1998; Ryff et al., Citation2004; Ryff & Keyes, Citation1995). A systematic review found that reliability varied by language, test-length, and age, but not by sample size or number of response options (Crouch et al., Citation2017). The 18-item scale found that Taiwanese women scored lower on autonomy and higher on environmental mastery, while the men scored higher on self-acceptance (Li et al., Citation2015). Likewise, the 18-item scale for Swedish white-collar workers confirmed gender differences in environmental mastery and purpose in life as well as an increase in self-acceptance among older participants (Lindfors et al., Citation2006). The longer versions found gender differences between environmental mastery and autonomy among Australian undergraduates and teachers (Burns & Machen, Citation2009).

Exploring the conceptualisation and operationalisation of the 18-item Ryff measure

In the operationalisation of the six proposed components of psychological wellbeing, Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995, p. 727) defined the six positive poles in the following way.

  • High scorers on self-acceptance hold a positive attitude toward themselves, acknowledge and accept multiple aspects of self, including bad as well as good qualities, and feel positive about their past life.

  • High scorers on positive relations with others hold warm, satisfying and trusting relationships with others, show concern about the welfare of others, are capable of expressing strong empathy, affection, and intimacy, and appreciate the give and take of human relationships.

  • High scorers on autonomy are independent and self-determining, can resist social pressure to think and act in certain ways, are able to regulate their behaviour from within, and evaluate themselves by personal standards.

  • High scorers on environmental mastery have a sense of mastery and competence in managing their environment, can control a complex array of external activities, make effective use of presented opportunities, and have the ability to select or to create appropriate contexts for their personal needs and values.

  • High scorers on purpose in life have clear goals in life and a clear sense of direction, sense of meaning within past and present life, hold beliefs that give life purpose and meaning and shape aims and objectives for their lives.

  • High scorers on personal growth hold to a sense of continuing development, see themselves as growing and expanding, remain open to new experiences, recognise improvements in themselves, feel that they are realising their potential, and change in ways that reflect growing self-knowledge and developing effectiveness.

In the short (18-item) form of the Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing each of these six components is assessed by three items, with one or two of these items in each set of six being negatively voiced. In the foundation paper for this instrument, Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995) provided support both for the proposed six-factor model and for a single second-order super factor.

Assessing psychological wellbeing in Muslim societies

Research on subjective mental health and psychological wellbeing within Muslim societies is an emerging and growing field (Joshanloo, Citation2013; Pool, Citation2020; Woodlock, Citation2012). Within this field, a small number of published studies have employed various forms of the Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing. For example, Joshanloo (Citation2010a) employed the 18-item measure translated into Persian to explore the effect of spirituality and religion on psychological wellbeing among Muslim undergraduate students in Iran. Joshanloo (Citation2010b) also employed the 18-item measure translated into Persian to explore the association between cultural estrangement and psychological wellbeing among undergraduate students in Iran. Jibeen and Khalid (Citation2012) employed the 54-item measure to examine psychological wellbeing among Pakistani adult immigrants to Canada. Scull (Citation2015) employed 14 items from the two subscales on environmental mastery and self-acceptance to explore psychological wellbeing among Muslim Kuwaiti civilian survivors of the 1990 Iraqi invasion. Jawaria and Dasti (Citation2016) employed the 54-item measure translated into Urdu to examine the relationship between caregiver burden, spirituality, and psychological wellbeing among Pakistani Muslim parents of children with chronic physical illness. Yusli et al. (Citation2021) employed the 42-item measure to examine the effect of restorative environments on psychological wellbeing among postgraduate students in Malaysia. Although the Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing has been employed in Muslim societies or among people drawn from Muslim societies, and critiqued from an Islamic perspective (Koburtay et al., Citation2022), there has as yet been no study that has focused specifically on examining the psychometric properties of these instruments within Muslim societies.

Research problem

Against this background the present study was shaped to test two hypotheses regarding the performance of the 18-item Scales of Psychological Wellbeing proposed by Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995) within a Muslim society. The first hypothesis is that the six components of positive psychological functioning identified by Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995), namely self-acceptance, personal growth, purpose in life, positive relations with others, environmental mastery, and autonomy, would cohere within a unidimensional factor of psychological wellbeing. The second hypothesis is that within a Muslim society the negatively-voiced items would detract from the unidimensional factor of psychological wellbeing.

Method

Procedure

The short form of the Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing was included within the online survey Parental Attachment and Life designed for completion by young adults between the ages of 18 and 26 who were born in Punjab and had lived there since their birth. Participants were assured of confidentiality. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Advanced Studies Research Board, Government College University, Lahore.

Instrument

The 18-item measure of wellbeing comprises six sets of three items, intended to capture the six core components of psychological wellbeing defined as self-acceptance, personal growth, purpose in life, positive relations with others, environmental mastery, and autonomy (Ryff & Keyes, Citation1995). Each item is rated on a seven-point Likert scale: strongly agree (7), somewhat agree (6), a little agree (5), neither agree nor disagree (4), a little disagree (3), somewhat disagree (2), and strongly disagree (1).

Participants

The Parental Attachment and Life survey was fully completed by 370 participants who met the profile of young adults between the ages of 18 and 26 who were born in Punjab and had lived there since their birth. The participants comprised 151 males, 217 females, and 2 who preferred not to say: 45 were aged 18 or 19, 131 were aged 20 or 21, 116 were aged 22 or 23, 65 were aged 24, 25, or 26, and 13 preferred not to say.

Analysis

The data were analysed by SPSS using the frequency, correlation, factor, and reliability routines.

Results

presents the principal component unrotated component matrix for the 18 items of the instrument. The first factor accounted for 30.4% of the variance and attracted strong loadings from all 10 of the positively-voiced items and just one of the eight negatively-voiced items. Working only with the positively-voiced items four of the six components of wellbeing were represented by two items and the remaining two components were represented by just one item each.

Table 1. Principal components unrotated component matrix.

presents the correlations between the ten positively-voiced items and the sum of the other nine items. These correlations, ranging between .49 and .69, demonstrate a good level of homogeneity among the items. The 10-item scale generated an alpha coefficient of .88 (Cronbach, Citation1951).

Table 2. The Psychological Wellbeing Scale for Muslim Societies: correlations between the individual items and the sum of the other nine items.

presents the mean scale scores for male and for female participants separately. In this sample there is no significant difference between the mean scores recorded by male and by female participants.

Table 3. The Psychological Wellbeing Scale for Muslim Societies: mean scale scores by sex.

Conclusion

This paper set out to explore the application of the 18-item measure of psychological wellbeing proposed by Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995) within a Muslim society and did so by means of a survey completed by 370 young adults between the ages of 18 and 26 years who were born in Punjab and had lived there since their birth. In light of previous studies, this paper focused on two specific hypotheses regarding the functioning of the instrument within a Muslim society.

One hypothesis proposed that within a Muslim society the eight negatively-voiced items within the set of 18 items would detract from, rather than enhance, the unidimensionality of the instrument. The data supported this hypothesis. The first factor of the principal component unrotated component matrix for the 18 items attracted strong loadings from all 10 of the positively-voiced items and just one of the eight negatively-voiced items. The recommendation is that within a Muslim society negatively-voiced items need to be treated with caution, not only within measures concerned with religious evaluation (as evidenced by Francis et al., Citation2006; Francis et al., Citation2016; Musharraf et al., Citation2014) and with measures concerned with the evaluation of others (as evidenced by Akhtar et al., Citationunder review), but also with measures concerned with self.

The other hypothesis proposed that, with the removal of the negatively-voiced items, the six components of positive psychological functioning identified by Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995), namely self-acceptance, personal growth, purpose in life, positive relations with others, environmental mastery, and autonomy, would cohere within a unidimensional factor of psychological wellbeing. The data supported this hypothesis. The 10 positively-voiced items generated an alpha coefficient of .88. The correlations between the individual items and the sum of the other nine items, ranging between .49 and .69, demonstrated a good level of homogeneity among the items. The recommendation is that within a Muslim society, Ryff’s definition of psychological wellbeing comprising six components holds well and that these six components can be captured by the 10 positively-voiced items originally proposed by Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995).

As an initial study exploring the application of the 18-item measure of psychological wellbeing proposed by Ryff and Keyes (Citation1995) within a Muslim society, there are clear limitations imposed on the generalisability of these findings, restricted to a sample of young adults between the ages of 18 and 26 who were born in Punjab. The findings, however, are of sufficient worth to commend replication and extension within other age groups within Punjab, and within other predominantly Muslim societies.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • Akhtar, N., Francis, L. J., McKenna, U., & Hasan, S. S. (under review). Introducing a short-form parental attachment questionnaire for Muslim societies (PAQ-MS): A study among young adults in Pakistan.
  • Anastasi, A. (1961). Psychological testing. Macmillan.
  • Astley, J., Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2012). Assessing attitude towards religion: The Astley–Francis Scale of Attitude towards Theistic Faith. British Journal of Religious Education, 34(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2011.614735
  • Barnette, J. J. (2000). Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(3), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970592
  • Barnette, J. J. (2001). Likert survey primacy effect in the absence or presence of negatively worded items. Research in the School, 8(1), 77–82.
  • Burns, R. A., & Machen, M. A. (2009). Investigating the structural validity of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scales across two samples. Social Indicators Research, 93(2), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9329-1
  • Cheng, S. T., & Chan, A. C. (2005). Measuring psychological well-being in the Chinese. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1307–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.013
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  • Crouch, M., Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., & Kwan, M. (2017). Variability of coefficient alpha: An empirical investigation of the scales of psychological wellbeing. Review of General Psychology, 21(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000112
  • Edwards, A. L. (1970). The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. Holt Rinehart.
  • Erken, H. G., & Francis, L. J. (2021). Internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Astley-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Theistic Faith revised among Muslim, Christian, and religiously unaffiliated secondary school students in England. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1851667
  • Fernandes, H. M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., & Teixeira, C. M. (2010). Preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being in Portuguese adolescents. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 1032–1043. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002675
  • Francis, L. J., Brockett, A., & Village, A. (2013). Measuring attitude toward theistic faith: Assessing the Astley-Francis scale among Christian, Muslim and secular youth in england. Research in Education, 89(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.89.1.6
  • Francis, L. J., & Lewis, C. A. (2016). Internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Astley-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Theistic Faith among religiously unaffiliated Christian and Muslim youth in the UK. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 19(5), 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2016.1206871
  • Francis, L. J., Sahin, A., & Al-Ansari, E. (2006). The psychometric properties of the Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Islam among young adults in Kuwait. Muslim Education Quarterly, 23, 69–82.
  • Francis, L. J., Tekke, M., & Robbins, M. (2016). The psychometric properties of the Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude towards Islam Revised among Sunni students in Malaysia. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 19(5), 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2016.1193480
  • Friedman, E. M., & Ryff, C. D. (2012). Living well with medical comorbidities: A biopsychosocial perspective. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(5), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr152
  • Gao, J., & McLellan, R. (2018). Using Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being in adolescents in mainland China. BMC Psychology, 6(17), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0231-6
  • Hailegiorgi, M. T., Berheto, T. M., Sibamo, E. L., Asseffa, N. A., Tesfa, G., & Birhanu, F. (2018). Psychological wellbeing of children at public primary schools in Jimma town: An orphan and non-orphan comparative study. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195377–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195377
  • Herzog, T. R., & Strevey, S. J. (2008). Contact with nature, sense of humor, and psychological well-being. Environment and Behavior, 40(6), 747–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507308524
  • Jawaria, A., & Dasti, R. (2016). Caregiver burden, spirituality, and psychological well-being of parents having children with thalassemia. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 941–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0127-1
  • Jibeen, T., & Khalid, R. (2012). Cross validation of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being. Translation into Urdu language. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 67–91. https://www.academia.edu/30299582/Cross_Validation_of_Ryffs_Scales_of_Psychological_Well_being_Translation_into_Urdu_Language.
  • Joshanloo, M. (2010a). Investigation of the contribution of spirituality and religiousness to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in Iranian young adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9236-4
  • Joshanloo, M. (2010b). Investigation of the relation between cultural estrangement and hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being in Iranian young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 733–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.017
  • Joshanloo, M. A. (2013). A comparison of Western and Islamic conceptions of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 1857–1874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9406-7
  • Kafka, G. J., & Kozma, A. (2002). The construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 57(1), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014451725204
  • Kenny, M. E. (1987). The extent and function of parental attachment among first-year college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02141544
  • Koburtay, T., Jawad, S., & Al Salhi, N. (2022). Theorizing the notion of well-being in Islam: An update of Ryff's theory of eudaimonic psychological well-being. Journal of Community Psychology, 2475–2490. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22790
  • Li, R. H., Kao, C. M., & Wu, Y. Y. (2015). Gender differences in psychological well-being: Tests of factorial invariance. Quality of Life Research, 24(11), 2577–2581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0999-2
  • Lindfors, P., Berntsson, L., & Lundberg, U. (2006). Factor structure of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scales in Swedish female and male white-collar workers. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1213–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.016
  • Manchirajhu, S. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of the Ryff’s Scale of psychological wellbeing in self-identified American entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, e00204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00204
  • Marks, N. F., & Lambert, J. D. (1998). Marital status continuity and change among young and midlife adults: Longitudinal effects on psychological well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 19(6), 652–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251398019006001
  • Mehrens, W., & Lehmann, L. (1983). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Mondi, C. F., & Reynolds, A. J. (2022). Psychological well-being in midlife following early childhood intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 34(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579421001528
  • Morozink, J. A., Friedman, E. M., Coe, C. L., & Ryff, C. D. (2010). Socioeconomic and psychosocial predictors of Interleukin-6 in the MIDUS national sample. Health Psychology, 29(6), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021360
  • Musharraf, S., Lewis, C. A., & Sultan, S. (2014). The Urdu translation of the Sahin-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Islam: A case of using only positive valence items in Pakistan. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 35(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2014.884847
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Oishi, S., & Heintzelman, S. J. (2019). Individual and societal wellbeing. In K. Deaux, & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 698–722). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.28.
  • Pool, F. W. (2020). Respect, freedom, citizenship: Muslim women’s secularities and perspectives on wellbeing. Religion, State and Society, 50(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2021.1971038
  • Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., & Anderson, A. B. (1983). Handbook of survey research. Academic Press.
  • Roszkowski, M. J., & Soven, M. (2010). Shifting gears: Consequences of including two negatively worded items in the middle of a positively worded questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802618344
  • Ryff, C. (1989a). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful ageing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548901200102
  • Ryff, C. (1989b). In the eye of the beholder: Views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.195
  • Ryff, C. (1989c). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  • Ryff, C. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
  • Ryff, C. D. (2019). Entrepreneurship and eudaimonic well-being: Five venues for new science. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(4), 646–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.003
  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
  • Ryff, C. D., Lee, Y. H., Essex, M. J., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). My children and me: Midlife evaluations of grown children and of self. Psychology and Aging, 9(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.195
  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1996). Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000289026
  • Ryff, C. D., Singer, B. H., & Dienberg Love, G. (2004). Positive health: Connecting well-being with biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1521
  • Sahin, A., & Francis, L. J. (2002). Assessing attitude toward Islam among Muslim adolescents: The psychometric properties of the Sahin-Francis scale. Muslim Educational Quarterly, 19(4), 35–47.
  • Scull, N. C. (2015). Forgiveness, revenge, and adherence to Islam as moderators for psychological wellbeing and depression among survivors of the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 9(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0009.103
  • Seo, Y. J., Sun, S., & Cheah, C. S. J. (2019). Confirming the multidimensionality of psychological well-being among Korean immigrant mothers in the United States. International Journal of Mental Health, 48(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2019.1578612
  • Shyrock, S., & Meeks, S. (2018). Internal consistency and factorial validity of the 42-item psychological well-being scales. Innovation in Aging, 2(1), 690–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy023.2568
  • Springer, K. W., & Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being: Method, mode and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1080–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004
  • Suárez-Alvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30(2), 149–158.
  • Triadó, C., Villar, F., Solé, C., & Celdrán, M. (2007). Construct balidity of Ryff's Scale of Psychological Well-being in Spanish older adults. Psychological Reports, 100(3), 1151–1164. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.100.3.1151-1164
  • Van Dierendonck, D. (2005). The construct validity of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3
  • Villar, F., Triado, C., Celdran, M., & Sole, C. (2010). Measuring well-being among Spanish older adults: Development of a simplified version of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being. Psychological Reports, 107(1), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.07.08.10.21.PR0.107.4.265-280
  • Woodlock, R. (2012). Muslim wellbeing in Australia: An analysis of personal and national wellbeing among a sample of Muslims living in New South Wales and Victoria. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 23(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2012.655063
  • Yusli, N., Roslan, S., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ghiami, Z., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Role of restorativeness in improving the psychological well-being of university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(646329), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646329
  • Zizek, S., Treven, S., & Cancer, V. (2015). Employees in Slovenia and their psychological well-being based on Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social Indicators Research, 121(1), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0645-3