Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine representative, core profile subtypes of learning and memory, based on four variables representing different latent constructs, in the standardization sample of the California Verbal Learning Test–Second Edition (CVLT–II; CitationDelis, Kramer, Kaplan, & Ober, 2000). Two-stage cluster analysis identified six reliable subtypes. Variability in both level and pattern of performance contributed to the differentiation of these subtypes. Level of education was meaningfully related to variability in overall performance of the subtypes. Implications for the interpretation of CVLT–II findings obtained in clinical practice are discussed.
The author thanks Harcourt Assessment, Inc. for access to the California Verbal Learning Test–Second Edition national sample. This research was based on standardization data of the California Verbal Learning Test–Second Edition (CVLT–II). Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt Assessment, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved. “California Verbal Learning Test” and “CVLT” are trademarks of Harcourt Assessment, Inc., registered in the United States of America and other jurisdictions.